We evaluated the feasibility of using waste activated sludge (WAS) from a wastewater treatment plant as an internal electron donor to fuel denitrification, by increasing its bioavailability with Focused-Pulsed (FP) technology. The focused-pulsed treatment of WAS (producing FP-WAS) increased the semi-soluble chemical oxygen demand (SSCOD) by 26 times compared with the control WAS. The maximum denitrification rate of FP-WAS (0.25 g nitrate-nitrogen [NO3- -N]/g volatile suspended solids [VSS] x d) was greater than for untreated WAS (0.05 g NO3- -N/g VSS x d) and methanol (0.15 NO3- -N/g VSS x d). Centrifuging out the larger suspended solids created FP-centrate, which had a rate (0.14 g NO3- -N/g VSS x d) comparable with that of methanol. Thus, FP treatment of WAS created SSCOD, which was an internal electron donor that was able to drive denitrification at a rate similar to or greater than methanol. One trade-off of using FP-WAS for denitrification is an increase in total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) loading. While FP-WAS achieved the lowest total nitrogen and NO3- -N concentrations in the batch denitrification test, its final ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration was the highest, as a result of the release of organic nitrogen from the FP-treated biomass; FP-centrate had less release of total soluble nitrogen. While the return of total nitrogen (TN) is small compared with the SSCOD, the effects of the added nitrogen loading need to be considered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143010x12609736967288DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electron donor
12
no3- -n/g
12
-n/g vss
12
waste activated
8
activated sludge
8
internal electron
8
denitrification rate
8
suspended solids
8
total nitrogen
8
denitrification
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!