A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Co-administration of ephedrine prevents reductions in cardiac output and systemic oxygen delivery secondary to lung compression maneuvers during one-lung ventilation, without reducing arterial oxygenation. | LitMetric

Purpose: We previously showed that compression of the nondependent lung during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients undergoing esophagectomy improves arterial oxygenation but impairs cardiac output (CO) and systemic oxygen delivery (DO(2)). The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the combination of nondependent lung compression and ephedrine improves arterial oxygenation without compromising DO(2).

Methods: Twenty patients undergoing esophagectomy through a right thoracotomy were studied. Under general anesthesia, a left-sided double-lumen tube was placed, and the dependent lung was mechanically ventilated with a tidal volume of 8 ml/kg and a fraction of inspiratory oxygen of 0.8 during OLV. When nondependent lung was compressed by surgeons to improve surgical exposure, a randomly determined intravenous bolus of either ephedrine 4 mg (group E) or an identical volume of saline (group S) was administered. Arterial blood was sampled during two-lung ventilation (TLV), at 10 min of OLV (OLV1), and 5 min after nondependent lung compression (OLV2).

Results: The initiation of OLV resulted in a significant drop in PaO(2) at OLV1 (group E, 136 ± 69 mmHg; group S, 138 ± 83 mmHg; P < 0.01) compared with TLV (group E, 404 ± 44 mmHg; group S; 367 ± 51 mmHg) and tended to improve at OLV2 (group E, 170 ± 63 mmHg; group S; 196 ± 121 mmHg). However, although CO and DO(2) significantly decreased in group S at OLV2 (4.0 ± 0.8 l/min, 621 ± 116 ml/min; P < 0.01) compared with OLV1 (5.1 ± 0.7 l/min, 811 ± 140 ml/min), there was no significant difference in these parameters in group E for the two time points.

Conclusion: Although arterial oxygenation was not significantly improved by the nondependent lung compression, the addition of intravenous ephedrine to nondependent lung compression prevented the decrease in systemic oxygen delivery without deterioration of arterial oxygenation during OLV in patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-010-1078-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nondependent lung
16
lung compression
12
arterial oxygenation
12
cardiac output
8
output systemic
8
systemic oxygen
8
oxygen delivery
8
one-lung ventilation
8
patients undergoing
8
undergoing esophagectomy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!