Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03222.x | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Interpretation of within-group change in randomised trials.
BMC Psychiatry
May 2020
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
In medicine, it is common to observe improvement after intervention, at least partly because patients present for care in extremis and would have improved without intervention. Controlling for this counterfactual explanation for improvement is the principle reason to conduct a trial in which patients are randomised to treatment or a control group. Accordingly, it is not reasonable to infer that both interventions are effective when the groups show similar improvements in outcome.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCommentary on Kypri & Livingston (2020): Alcohol trading hour restrictions reduce assault incidence.
Addiction
November 2020
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
The reply to Sharpe et al.: Hawthorne effect in the YourCall trial suggested by participants qualitative responses.
J Clin Epidemiol
November 2019
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Response to Kypri's commentary on Moore: red tape, the limitations of policy and a science of prevention.
Addiction
March 2018
Violence and Society Research Group, School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Commentary on Moore et al. (2017): Focus on policies rather than programmes to address alcohol-related violence.
Addiction
November 2017
School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!