Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In this study we compared the QIAsymphony Sample Preparation and Assay Setup modules (Qiagen), which provide automated nucleic acid extraction and PCR setup, to the NucliSens easyMAG (bioMérieux) and CAS-1200 liquid handling station (Corbett) for a molecular screening approach of enteric pathogens in fecal samples using multiplex real-time PCR. The relative DNA recovery of both platforms, within- and between-run reproducibility and a prospective study, including 510 clinical fecal samples, were performed. The results demonstrated that the QIAsymphony Sample Preparation and Assay Setup modules were highly reproducible and achieve equal performance, quantitative and qualitative, when compared with the NucliSens easyMAG and CAS-1200 systems for the molecular screening analysis of enteric pathogens in fecal samples.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.12.024 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!