A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Extended indication of endoscopic resection for mucosal early gastric cancer: analysis of a single center experience. | LitMetric

Extended indication of endoscopic resection for mucosal early gastric cancer: analysis of a single center experience.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol

Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon Graduate School of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Published: May 2011

Background: Endoscopic resection (ER) has become an important therapeutic option for early gastric cancer (EGC). Some investigators have suggested that this indication should be extended. We aimed to compare the extended indication of ER for intramucosal EGC based on data from a large, single-center study.

Methods: We assessed lymph node metastasis (LNM) status in 1721 intramucosal EGC patients who underwent surgery to evaluate the potential of extension of the ER. We investigated LNM according to Japanese extended criteria; differentiated mucosal cancers irrespective of ulcer less than 30 mm (Criteria I); differentiated mucosal cancers without ulceration irrespective of tumor size (Criteria II), undifferentiated less than 20 mm without ulceration (Criteria III). We also tried to find the groups which have no and minimal risk of lymph node metastasis.

Results: The rate of LNM of mucosal cancer was 2.6% (45/1721). There was minimal lymph nodal metastasis risk for criteria I (0.28%, 2/726, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0-0.66%), and criteria II (0.23%, 2/882, 95% CI, 0-0.54%). For criteria III, there was significant lymph node metastasis risk (1.15%, 3/261, 95% CI, 0-2.44%). There was no lymph node metastasis in differentiated mucosal cancer less than 20 mm irrespective of ulcer (0%, 0/501, 95% CI 0-0.73%). The differentiated mucosal cancer group irrespective of ulcer and tumor size have a minimal risk of metastasis (0.43%, 4/941, 95% CI, 0-0.84%)

Conclusion: Our data support extension of the ER indication for the differentiated mucosal EGC. However, undifferentiated lesions without ulceration and smaller than 20 mm were associated with significant metastasis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06611.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

differentiated mucosal
20
lymph node
16
node metastasis
12
irrespective ulcer
12
mucosal cancer
12
extended indication
8
endoscopic resection
8
early gastric
8
gastric cancer
8
intramucosal egc
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!