Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This study investigated the prevalence of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins (MLS(B)) among staphylococci in a series of 301 erythromycin-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Erythromycin-resistance phenotypes were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and specific resistance genes erm(A), erm(B), erm(C), msr(A) and msr(B) were identified using polymerase chain reaction. Two hundred of 301 (66.5%) erythromycin-resistant staphylococcal isolates exhibited resistance to MLS(B) antibiotics. Of these, 127 (63.5%) exhibited a cMLS(B) resistance phenotype (resistant to both erythromycin and clindamycin), whereas 73 (36.5%) expressed the iMLS(B) resistance phenotype (resistant to erythromycin and susceptible to clindamycin). The most prevalent resistance determinants were erm(A) (62%) among S. aureus and erm(C) (30%) among CoNS isolates. Combinations of resistance mechanisms were rarely seen, and occurred most often in oxacillin-resistant isolates. The results of the present study support the idea that there are geographical differences in the prevalence of erythromycin resistance mechanisms among staphylococci, therefore local surveillance studies are important tools for guiding therapy and in the promotion of judicious use of antimicrobial agents.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60081-3 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!