A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Automated measurement method and tool of glomerular filtration rate using triphasic helical computed tomography images. | LitMetric

Objectives: To introduce an automated method to perform computed tomography-based glomerular filtration rate (CT GFR) measurement using the 2-point Patlak plot technique and triphasic helical CT images. We also evaluated the correlation between our automated method and the manual measurement results, as well as the results from cystatin C.

Methods: The present study included 25 patients without an acute renal disorder. The CT scan protocol consisted of an unenhanced CT examination followed by 2 contrast-enhanced CT examinations in the arterial and parenchymal phase. Between the noncontrast scan and the arterial scan, 7 dynamic scans were obtained to provide more data on the arterial input function. The 2-point Patlak plot technique was used in the automated and manual measurement methods. For each patient, the cystatin C level, determined in blood samples, was used as a reference.

Results: The correlation between our automated method and the cystatin C method in 25 patients was 0.8029 (P < .001). The correlation between the manually implemented CT GFR method and the cystatin C method was 0.8287 (P < .001). A strong correlation (r = .9518, P < .001) was seen between the automated and manual measurements using the same model; however, the automated process can be finished within 2 minutes.

Conclusions: The automated CT GFR measurement method could potentially be used because of its highly improved efficiency. Moreover, it would avoid the use of a differential renal nuclear study. This would be helpful for predicting the residual GFR after nephrectomy and could also be used to predict the residual GFR after partial nephrectomy for tumor or stone treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.09.029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

automated method
12
automated
8
method
8
measurement method
8
glomerular filtration
8
filtration rate
8
triphasic helical
8
gfr measurement
8
2-point patlak
8
patlak plot
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!