Wingspan stent for symptomatic M1 stenosis of middle cerebral artery.

Eur J Radiol

Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou 450052, China.

Published: December 2011

Objective: Stent placement for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis has become an alternative treatment technique; however, stent placement for middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis remains a technical and clinical challenge. Our purpose was to assess the safety and feasibility of Wingspan stent for patients with symptomatic M1 stenosis, and its initial effect on prevention of ischemic events.

Methods: Fifty-three cases with recurrent symptomatic MCA stenosis resistant to medical therapy treated by self-expanding stent were reviewed retrospectively (average 58±18.5 years old, 19 women). All patients underwent angioplasty and stenting with the Gateway balloon-Wingspan stent system, and advised follow-up with DSA or TCD at 6th month.

Results: Patients had an average stenosis ratio of 76.5±15.4% prior to the treatment. Of the 53 patients, the technical success rate was 98.1% as a whole (52/53). The mean degree of stenosis reduced from (76.5±15.4)% to (18.2±11.3)%. Complications associated with the procedure include subarachnoid hemorrhage (1.89%) and occlusion (3.78%) occurred. During a follow-up of 6 months, there was no recurrence of transient ischemic attack or stroke in 52 cases with successful stenting. Cerebral hemodynamics of MCA using transcranial Doppler monitoring were at normal level (<120 cm/s) in 41 follow-up patients. The follow up angiography at 6 month post-procedure was conducted in 32 patients and showed good patency in stented vessels.

Conclusions: Wingspan stent for symptomatic stenosis of middle cerebral artery is a safe and feasible procedure. It improves clinical outcome in the intermediate follow up, but its long-term effect remains to be further evaluated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wingspan stent
8
symptomatic stenosis
8
middle cerebral
8
cerebral artery
8
stent placement
8
mca stenosis
8
stenosis
7
stent
5
stent symptomatic
4
stenosis middle
4

Similar Publications

Background: In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a crucial factor that affects the long-term efficacy of intracranial bare metal stent (BMS) implantation for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). Patients with intracranial ISR are at a high risk of recurrent ischaemic events. The NOVA intracranial drug-eluting stent (DES) trial demonstrates that a DES can reduce ISR and stroke recurrence after intracranial bare stent implantation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluated a new device called the Stabilizer, designed to enhance the safety and efficacy of neuroendovascular procedures that require exchanging medical instruments, which can be risky due to potential vessel injury.! -
  • Conducted across nine centers in Japan, the trial involved 31 patients with conditions like intracranial aneurysms and artery stenosis, with the Stabilizer achieving a 100% technical success rate and no device-related complications.! -
  • The findings of this first multicenter trial underscore the Stabilizer's potential as a reliable tool in managing complex neuroendovascular cases where traditional exchange methods might pose challenges.!
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although endovascular stenting is considered an effective and safe therapeutic option for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (sICAD), an elevated rate of restenosis remains an important issue for the conventional bare-metal stent (BMS). Recent evidence from observational studies suggests that applying drug-coated balloons (DCB) in sICAD may decrease restenosis occurrence. Additional large randomised studies are warranted to provide firmer evidence and to determine which patients would benefit most from DCB.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study compared the Wingspan and Credo stent systems for treating severe intracranial artery stenosis in patients who did not respond to medication.
  • A total of 29 patients were analyzed, with no significant differences in technical success, safety, or outcomes between the two stent systems.
  • Both stent systems showed promising results, but further research is needed to confirm these findings on a larger scale.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The use of endovascular treatments for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) remains contentious due to high periprocedural complications. Many centers resort to general anesthesia for airway protection and optimal periprocedural conditions; however, this approach lacks real-time monitoring of patients' neurological status during procedures. In this study, we employed intracranial stenting with the Wingspan system under local anesthesia to address this challenge.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!