Current management of cervical esophageal cancer.

World J Surg

Division of Esophageal and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.

Published: March 2011

Background: Pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (PLE) has been regarded as a standard treatment for cervical esophageal cancer, but the morbidity and mortality rates associated with PLE are substantial. Chemoradiation (CTRT) is widely used to treat esophageal cancer; however, its role in managing cervical esophageal cancer has not been fully elucidated. It was hypothesized that up-front CTRT could be an effective alternative treatment option to PLE. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with cervical esophageal cancer treated with these two methods.

Methods: Patients with cervical esophageal cancer from 1995 to 2008 were studied. Three main groups were identified: those treated with PLE, those managed with up-front concurrent chemoradiation, and those not suitable for either PLE or chemoradiation but to whom palliative treatment was offered. The demographics, management strategies, and outcomes of these patients were studied and analyzed.

Results: A total of 107 patients were studied: 87 (81.3%) were men, and the median age was 64 years (range 17-92 years). There were 62 patients who underwent PLE as the primary treatment, 21 had up-front chemoradiation, and the others had palliative treatment. In the PLE group, curative resection was achieved in 37 (59.7%) patients, 20 of whom had either adjuvant chemoradiation or radiotherapy. The hospital mortality rate was 7.1%. In the chemoradiation group, 10 (47.6%) had tumor down-staging, 6 of whom achieved a clinically complete response. Among the 11 patients with poor response, 5 required salvage PLE for palliation. Chemoradiation-associated morbidities included oral mucositis, bilateral vocal cord palsy, esophageal stricture, carotid artery blowout, and permanent hypothyroidism and hypoparathyroidism. The median survival durations of patients in the PLE and chemoradiation groups were 20 and 25 months respectively (P = 0.39).

Conclusions: Up-front chemoradiation can be an alternative therapeutic strategy to PLE. However, this method is not without drawbacks. A significant proportion also requires salvage surgery. Both PLE and chemoradiation have significant curative as well as palliative role in the management of cervical esophageal cancer and treatment should be individualized.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0876-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

esophageal cancer
28
cervical esophageal
24
ple chemoradiation
12
ple
11
chemoradiation
9
management cervical
8
esophageal
8
patients
8
outcomes patients
8
patients cervical
8

Similar Publications

This study investigates the prognostic value of serum biomarkers PD-L1 and IGFBP-2 in patients with esophageal carcinoma. It finds a significant positive correlation between these biomarkers and established tumor markers CEA and CYFRA21-1. The 3-year survival rate for the patient cohort was 45.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multi-disciplinary treatment of broncho-esophageal fistula in a high-risk single-lung patient.

J Cardiothorac Surg

January 2025

Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway.

Background: A broncho-esophageal fistula (BEF) is a medical and surgical disaster. Treatment of BEF is often limited to palliative stent treatment that may migrate or cause erosions and tissue necrosis. Surgical repair of BEF is the only established definite treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Risk assessment for esophageal cancer after bariatric surgery: a comparative cohort study between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass.

Surg Obes Relat Dis

December 2024

Department of Digestive Surgery, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital Pessac, Bordeaux, France; BRIC (BoRdeaux Institute of onCology), UMR1312, INSERM, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address:

Background: The risk of esophageal cancer after bariatric surgery is a matter of debate.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the risk of esophageal cancer following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (GB).

Methods: We extracted data from the national discharge database (Programme De Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information) for patients who underwent bariatric surgery in France between 2007 and 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Q&A with Lin Shen.

Med

January 2025

Professor Lin Shen, MD, graduated from Xuzhou Medical College in 1984 and Beijing Medical University in 1995. She trained at the US National Institutes of Health in 2000, focusing on therapies for gastrointestinal tumors. Currently, she is director of the Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Department of Early Drug Development Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The benefits of neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery for patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer have been well established by multiple trials. However, there may be socioeconomic barriers impacting equitable administration. We aim to identify whether disparities exist in uptake of neoadjuvant therapy among patients with loco-regional oesophageal cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!