Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The significance of mitotic rate (MR) in melanoma remains controversial.
Methods: In this retrospective analysis of a prospective randomized trial that included patients with melanoma of 1.0 mm or greater, all patients underwent wide excision and sentinel node (sentinel lymph node [SLN]) biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors predictive of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: A total of 551 patients had MR reported. A cut-off point of 6 mitoses/mm(2) best discriminated DFS and OS: 455 patients (82.6%) had MR less than 6/mm(2). SLN were tumor-positive in 14.7% of low MR versus 31.3% of high MR patients (P = .0003). There were significant differences in DFS (P = .0014) and OS (P = .0002) between the 2 groups, however, MR failed to remain significant in the multivariate model.
Conclusions: MR is weakly predictive of SLN status but it is not an independent predictor of survival for melanomas 1.0 mm or thicker.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.037 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!