A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Diazepam autoinjector intramuscular delivery system versus diazepam rectal gel: A pharmacokinetic comparison. | LitMetric

Diazepam autoinjector intramuscular delivery system versus diazepam rectal gel: A pharmacokinetic comparison.

Epilepsy Res

Center for Drug Studies, Departments of Pharmacy and Neuroloy, Smith Building Room 334, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Pharmacy, 410 North 12th Street, PO Box 980583, Richmond, VA 23298-0583, United States.

Published: January 2011

Rectal administration of diazepam (DZ) has been used effectively in patients with epilepsy who experience acute repetitive seizures, but rectal gel may be difficult to administer during a seizure and is subject to variable drug absorption. An intramuscular (IM) autoinjector DZ formulation may offer a practical alternative to rectal DZ. This single-center, open-label, 3-treatment, 3-period crossover study compared the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of 10mg DZ administered rectally in 24 healthy, fasted and fed subjects versus IM autoinjector delivery in fasted subjects. Blood samples were collected at baseline and for up to 24h postdose and plasma DZ concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. There were no significant differences between plasma concentrations for rectal administration of DZ in fasted and fed subjects at any time point. Intramuscular DZ administration resulted in more rapid and less variable drug absorption than rectal delivery. At 30min postdose and at all subsequent evaluations, IM administration resulted in significantly higher areas under the curve versus rectal administration in fasted subjects (p<0.05). This significant difference was sustained throughout the remainder of the 24-h study period (p<0.05). All reported adverse events were considered mild, and none required treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.10.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal administration
12
rectal gel
8
variable drug
8
drug absorption
8
fasted fed
8
fed subjects
8
fasted subjects
8
plasma concentrations
8
administration fasted
8
rectal
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!