Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Under analyses there were reparative operations on 79 patients with end colostomies performed using medial access in 42 patients and parastomal access in 37 patients. The investigation of prevalence of the adhesive process in 61 patients has shown that marked adhesions were formed in the area of the medial scar in 41 (67.2%) patients, the stump of the suppressed gut--in 31 (50.9%) patients and colostomy--in 27 (44.3%) Reestablishment of intestine continuity from the parastomal access allowed avoidance of adhesions in the zone of the medial postoperative scar which shortened the time of operation and decreased the level of intra- and postoperative complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!