The optimal treatment approach for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is not well defined. Intensive therapeutic regimens result in high response rates and prolonged progression-free survival but at the expense of significant toxicity. We report here our results of the administration of rituximab plus chlorambucil (R-Chl) as first line treatment in patients with MCL. Twenty consecutively diagnosed patients were treated with this combination in which an induction and a maintenance arm were included. During induction, rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m(2) on day 1, while chlorambucil was given afterward at a dose of 10 mg/day for 10 consecutive days for eight cycles and then as a single agent for an additional four cycles. Maintenance consisted of rituximab administration every 2 months for 1 year. Most patients had indolent disease features such as a low mantle-cell international prognostic index (MIPI) score. The overall response rate was 95% (90% CR, 5% PR). Among patients in CR, 78% presented a molecular remission. The 3-year progression-free survival was 89%. There were no serious side effects. These results show that the R-Chl combination could be an effective therapeutic option as first line treatment in MCL, especially for patients with indolent disease characteristics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2010.534518DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rituximab chlorambucil
8
treatment patients
8
patients mantle
8
mantle cell
8
cell lymphoma
8
progression-free survival
8
patients indolent
8
indolent disease
8
patients
7
combination rituximab
4

Similar Publications

Background: About 80% of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) have relapses. Of these children, half will relapse frequently, and are at risk of adverse effects from corticosteroids. While non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications prolong periods of remission, they have significant potential adverse effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Real-world data for marginal zone lymphoma patients in the French REALYSA cohort: The REALMA study.

Hematol Oncol

November 2024

Université Paris Cité, Assistante Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service d'Hémato-Oncologie, Paris, France.

Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) comprises three subtypes: extranodal MZL (EMZL), splenic MZL (SMZL) and nodal MZL (NMZL). Since clinical trials have limited representativeness, there is a need for real-world data (RWD) evidence in MZL. Real-world data in Lymphoma and survival in Adults (REALYSA) is a prospective multicentric French cohort of newly diagnosed lymphoma patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This real-world retrospective cohort study using Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% investigated changes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment by line of therapy, time-to-next-treatment, treatment duration, and overall survival (OS). Overall, 803 patients received their first PBS-reimbursed CLL medication between 1 January 2011 to 31 July 2021 (median age: 70 years; 64.6% male), 289 post-1 August 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The IELSG38 trial was conducted to investigate the effects of subcutaneous (SC) rituximab on the complete remission (CR) rate and the benefits of SC rituximab maintenance in patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who received front-line treatment with chlorambucil plus rituximab. Study treatment was an induction phase with oral chlorambucil 6 mg/m2/day on weeks 1-6, 9-10, 13-14, 17-18, and 21-22, and intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of weeks 1-4, and 1,400 mg SC on weeks 9, 13, 17, and 21. Then, a maintenance phase followed with rituximab administered at 1,400 mg SC every two months for two years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) with moderate risk or above was recommended to receive immunosuppressive therapy. We attempted to evaluate the optimal dose of glucocorticoid when combined with evidence-proven effective immunosuppressants by network meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!