Objectives: Diabetes patients suffer from comorbid conditions and disease-related complications. Combined with demographic, clinical and treatment satisfaction variables, they have a confounding effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study compared the sensitivity of EQ-5D, SF-6D and 15D utilities to the specific effect of diabetes complications.
Methods: Utilities were compared in 319 type II diabetics with and without comorbidities and complications. Based on subsample size and confirmed diagnoses, coronary heart disease (CHD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) were two complications chosen for further analysis. Significant EQ-5D, SF-6D and 15D predictors were identified with OLS regression and subsequently controlled for with ANCOVA.
Results: The presence of CHD resulted in utility decrements (P < 0.001) for all instruments, whereas DR only decreased 15D utilities (P < 0.05). Gender, age, treatment satisfaction, arthropathy and diabetic foot were significant predictors throughout, whereas BMI, neuropathy and CHD for at least two utilities. After controlling for these confounding variables, 15D still discriminated between diabetics with and without CHD (P < 0.01) and DR (P < 0.05), with seven and five dimensions affected, respectively.
Conclusions: After removing the effect of background variables, 15D utilities remain sensitive to CHD and DR. The obvious explanation is its richer descriptive system, which provides increased discriminative ability compared to EQ-5D and SF-6D, and this might be evidence for preferring the 15D in economic evaluations of interventions for diabetics. However, the need remains for further testing in other diabetes complications and more diverse patient samples.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-010-0290-y | DOI Listing |
Value Health
December 2024
Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Objectives: When health fluctuates recurrently estimating quality-of-life is challenging, risking over/underestimation due to measures' recall periods and timing. To inform how/when to capture quality-of-life, we compare responses using different recall periods and assessment timings.
Methods: For one 3-week chemotherapy cycle, cancer patients were randomly assigned to complete EQ-5D-5L or SF-12v2 (daily with a daily recall, and weekly with a weekly recall, and at 3-weeks with a 3-week recall); a third group completed SF-12v2 daily with a 3-week recall.
Value Health
December 2024
Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, Samuel Fox House, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, England, UK.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an extended-role general practitioner symptoms clinic (SC), added to usual care (UC) for patients with multiple persistent physical symptoms (sometimes known as medically unexplained symptoms).
Methods: This was a 52-week within-trial cost-utility analysis of a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing SC + UC (n = 178) with UC alone (n = 176), conducted from the primary perspective of the UK National Health Service and personal and social services (PSS). Base-case quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were measured using EQ-5D-5L.
Eur J Health Econ
October 2024
JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the measurement properties of EQ-5D-5 L, SF-6Dv2, QLU-C10D, and FACT-8D in survivors of Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (CHL).
Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted from May to August 2022 to collect data. Chinese value sets were used to estimate the utility scores for EQ-5D-5 L, SF-6Dv2, and QLU-C10D, while the Australian value set was used for FACT-8D.
Int J Drug Policy
November 2024
Richard Ivey School of Business, Western Ontario University, London N6A 3K7, Canada.
Background And Aim: We aim to identify within-trial and modelled Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA) in substance use disorders (SUD) and review the applicability assessment associated with health utility used in modelled CUA.
Study Design And Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, EconLit and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) databases. A global systematic literature search was undertaken to determine the CUA of SUD interventions.
Perit Dial Int
October 2024
Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Background: Although both hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) are covered by national healthcare insurance, 98% of kidney failure disease patients are treated with hemodialysis. This study compared the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and utility scores of patients receiving hemodialysis and CAPD in Indonesia and determined factors associated with HRQoL and utility scores.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 and EQ-5D-5L instruments at six hospitals.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!