Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
β-thalassemia trait (β-TT) is a common genetic disorder in Mediterranean countries, including Greece. Previous studies have shown the protective effect of β-TT against myocardial infarction. However, the ambulatory blood pressure (BP) profile of such patients has not yet been investigated. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) profile of hypertensives with β-TT, in comparison with all-cause anemic and non-anemic essential hypertensive patients. The study ultimately comprised of 8861 essential hypertensive, nondiabetic patients who were divided into three groups: group I (n=191, with β-TT), group II (n=655, anemic) and group III (n=8015, nonanemic). All patients underwent full clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic evaluations, whereas all were subjected to ABPM. Anemia was defined as Hb <12 g per 100 ml for women and <13 g per 100 ml for men, whereas patients with β-TT were self-referred. The distribution of dipping patterns among the three groups was 61.3 vs. 41.2 vs. 45.8% (P<0.001), whereas for nondippers it was 20.4 vs. 31.5 vs. 27.7% (P<0.001), for extreme-dippers it was 15.7 vs. 15.0 vs. 17.5% (P<0.001) and for reverse dippers it was 2.6 vs. 12.4 vs. 9.0% (P<0.001). Furthermore, mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) among the three groups was 140.13 ± 7.79 vs. 142.02 ± 11.61 vs. 141.99 ± 9.87 mm Hg (P=0.03), and mean nighttime SBP was 125.87 ± 10.4 vs. 131.13 ± 15.7 vs. 129.62 ± 13.31 mm Hg (P<0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, after adjustments for age, body mass index and lipid levels, the differences among daytime and nighttime SBP remained significant at 140.18 ± 9.84 vs. 142.02 ± 9.85 vs. 141.99 ± 9.85 mm Hg (P=0.04) and 125.99 ± 13.07 vs. 131.19 ± 13.08 vs. 129.61 ± 13.07 mm Hg (P<0.001), respectively. Hypertensive patients with β-TT present with a better 24-h BP profile in comparison with anemic and nonanemic hypertensives. Thus, β-TT may function protectively in their total cardiovascular risk profile.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hr.2010.226 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!