Objective: This pooled analysis assessed the safety of omalizumab in children with allergic (immunoglobulin E-mediated) asthma.
Study Design: Two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in children (6 to < 12 years) with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma investigated the efficacy/safety of omalizumab. Children on optimized asthma care (inhaled corticosteroids ± other controller medications) were randomized (2:1) to omalizumab (75-375 mg sc, q2 or q4 wk) or placebo. Pooled safety findings from these trials are presented in this publication.
Results: The safety population included 926 children (omalizumab, n = 624; placebo, n = 302). Adverse events (AEs) were more frequently reported in the placebo (91.7%) than omalizumab (89.7%) group. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection and headache. Suspected treatment-related AEs included headache, erythema and urticaria; none of which were reported by ≥ 2% of patients receiving omalizumab. Serious AEs (SAEs) were reported by 3.4% and 6.6% of patients receiving omalizumab and placebo, respectively; the most common were appendicitis, pneumonia and bronchitis; no deaths were reported.
Conclusions: Omalizumab has an acceptable safety profile, with a risk of AEs similar to placebo. This, combined with its efficacy profile, suggests that omalizumab may provide an additional asthma management option for children (6 to < 12 years) uncontrolled with current therapy that follows established guidelines.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2010.539502 | DOI Listing |
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
January 2025
Clinic of Internal Medicine II - Department of Pneumology, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna (Austria). Electronic address:
Background: Clinical studies of biologics in severe asthma exclude smokers or ex-smokers (ExS) with over 10 pack-years (py). Thus, the effectiveness of this therapy in ex-smokers with severe asthma is not well understood.
Objectives: To assess the impact of smoking on clinical efficiency of biologics in patients with severe asthma from the German Asthma Net (GAN), a comprehensive international registry.
Rev Paul Pediatr
January 2025
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Objective: This paper aims to review the efficacy and safety of current chronic urticaria (CU) treatment in children and the existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in this age group.
Data Source: Since there are few studies of CU in children, the authors performed a non-systematic review of published articles in English, Spanish, and Portuguese in the PubMed database in the last decade. Keywords used were (antihistamines OR omalizumab OR cyclosporine OR treatment) AND (chronic urticaria) AND (children OR adolescents).
CEN Case Rep
December 2024
Department of Pediatrics, Songjiang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.748, Zhongshan Middle Road, Songjiang District, Shanghai, 201600, China.
Nephrotic syndrome (NS) and atopic diseases are linked through shared immunological pathways, with allergic triggers often contributing to NS relapses, particularly in immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated pathways. Omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting free and cell-bound IgE, is commonly used in treating atopic diseases. We presented a pediatric case with a history of eczema, asthma, and recurrent atopic rhinitis, who first developed NS at age three, responding well to steroid therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Emerging evidences have underscored the positive impact of biologics on asthmatic patients. However, there is a pressing need to verify their therapeutic efficacy in children and adolescents with asthma. To address this, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologics in the asthma management of this demographic.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!