Objective: To investigate if 30-Minutes-TUMT was useful and safe in the treatment of chronic urinary retention due to BOO in patients with ASA II-III-IV.
Material And Methods: 19 patients with chronic urinary retention (mean age 73.5 years) were scheduled for TUMT treatment because of absolute or relative contraindications to surgery. According to ASA classification there were 8 patients ASA II, 9 ASA III and 2 ASA IV. Routinely parameters were studied before and after treatment. Pain and patient's discomfort before, during and after TUMT treatment were registered using the VAS score (visual analogue scale: 0 = no pain and 10 = maximal pain). Urgency, irritation, and "how they feel" were registered at 2 days, 1, 2 and 4 weeks after TUMT using VAS technique.
Results: Mean follow-up was 31,6 months (range 24-47), among the 9 responders patients (47.4%) who void normally without need of catheterisation, one patient died 12 months after the treatment for reasons not connected to the TUMT. Six patients (21.6%) failed the treatment and underwent TURP one or two years later (5 were ASA II and one ASA III). Among the 4 of 19 (21.0%) who had intermittent catheterisation after the treatment two died 1 and 2 years later, one has detrusor instability and one continued intermittent catheterisation. VAS during treatment was: 0 minute = 0.0; 5' = 3.1; 15' = 2.9; 25' = 2.8; 2 h after the treatment = 0.3. At 3 years follow up IPSS, QoL and Qmax were still acceptable. No major complication occurred.
Conclusions: 47.4% of the patients responded positively to the new 30 minutes TUMT removing the urethral catheter, without needing surgical procedure avoiding the operation risk. 68.4% also improved their QoL. Local anaesthesia and oral/intravenous analgesia were sufficient during treatment. TUMT seems to have no anesthesiological risk. It is an option in patients with high risk of operation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Absence of Race/Ethnicity Reporting in Clinical Trials of True Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Urology
October 2024
Division of Urology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address:
Objective: To assess the extent of racial reporting and enrollment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for the office-based treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Methods: A systematic review was conducted for RCTs assessing 6 office-based MISTs: transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT), prostatic artery embolization, prostatic urethral lift, temporary implantable nitinol device, water vapor thermal therapy, and Optilume. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up to November 3, 2023.
Non-inferiority, randomised, open-label clinical trial on the effectiveness of transurethral microwave thermotherapy compared to prostatic artery embolisation in reducing severe lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: study protocol for the TUMT-PAE-1 trial.
Trials
September 2024
Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Background: One-fourth of men older than 70 years have lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that impair their quality of life. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of LUTS caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that cannot be managed conservatively or pharmacologically. However, TURP is only an option for patients fit for surgery and can result in complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: We aim to compare efficacy and safety of water vapour therapy (Rezūm), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) and transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT) for treating men with moderate to severe benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms.
Materials: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 30 July 2023, followed by reference searching and dual-independent study selection. We analysed only randomized clinical trials.
Reoperation after surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
December 2023
Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Context: Surgical treatment is important for male lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS) management, but there are few reviews of the risks of reoperation.
Objective: To systematically evaluate the current evidence regarding the reoperation rates of surgical treatment for LUTS in accordance with current recommendations and guidelines.
Evidence Acquisition: Eligible studies published up to July 2023, were searched for in the PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA), Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and Web of Science™ (Clarivate™, Philadelphia, PA, USA) databases.
Purpose: The purpose of this American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline amendment is to provide a useful reference on the effective evidence-based management of male lower urinary tract symptoms secondary/attributed to BPH (LUTS/BPH).
Materials And Methods: The Minnesota Evidence Review Team searched Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) database to identify studies relevant to the management of BPH. The guideline was updated in 2023 to capture eligible literature published between September 2020 and October 2022.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!