The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of S-1 monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who have failed the standard oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. From 2007 to 2010, metastatic CRC patients who received S-1 monotherapy as salvage treatment were identified from tumor registry at Samsung Medical Center. All patients received ≥ second-line treatment for CRC. S-1 was administered orally from day 1 to day 14, every 3 weeks. The dose of S-1 for each patient was determined according to body surface area (BSA) as follows: for BSA < 1.25 m(2), 80 mg/day; for 1.25 m(2) < BSA < 1.5 m(2), 100 mg/day; and for BSA > 1.5 m(2), 120 mg/day divided by 2 doses. The median age of the 19 patients was 59 years (range: 33-77). Fourteen (73.7%) of 19 patients received S-1 monotherapy as third-line treatment after failing oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Previous regimens prior to S-1 therapy were as follows: FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI, XELOX + avastin, and cetuximab + irinotecan. The median number of administered S-1 courses given in the entire studied population was 3 cycles (1-10 cycles). Three patients had confirmed partial response (PR) after 3 cycles of S-1 treatment. After a follow-up duration of 22.3 months (range: 6.7-32.6 months), median time to progression (TTP) was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8-4.2) months. Median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 8.8-16.8) from the time of S-1 chemotherapy administration. Two patients had grade 1 hand-foot syndrome (HFS) after first and 2nd cycles of treatments, respectively, but treatments were continued without developing further adverse events. The salvage S-1 monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who failed irinotecan-based or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was moderately effective and well tolerated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9755-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

s-1 monotherapy
20
monotherapy metastatic
12
metastatic colorectal
12
colorectal cancer
12
patients failed
12
patients received
12
s-1
10
patients
9
salvage s-1
8
cancer patients
8

Similar Publications

Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who fail first- and second-line treatments face significant challenges in third-line therapy, where monotherapies often yield poor outcomes and limited survival benefits. The prognosis is particularly poor for mCRC with the unique molecular subtype of BRAF V600E mutation. This report describes sustained benefits from a third-line treatment regimen (SFS) combining tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1), fruquintinib, and sintilimab in a patient with BRAF V600E-mutated MSS mCRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 70-year-old man was admitted to a local hospital with epigastric pain and diagnosed with type-2 gastric cancer. Contrast-enhanced CT scan showed metastases in S3 and S8 of the liver, and the tumor was classified as type cT4aN2H1, cStage ⅣB. Nivolumab monotherapy was initiated after failure of treatment with S-1 plus oxaliplatin and ramucirumab.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative advanced gastric cancer (GC) has a high global incidence and mortality rate with limited options for second-line treatment. Monotherapy is not effective and the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has not yet been included in the guidelines. The present study aimed to explore a new treatment approach by conducting a single-center, retrospective, observational real-world study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: S-1 monotherapy had previously been widely used as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy mainly in Japan. Based on the results of the NAPOLI-1 trial, the recommended second-line therapy is now liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV). However, there have been no studies comparing nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy with S-1 monotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Pancreatic cancer is aggressive and often spreads quickly; APS, a traditional Chinese medicine, shows promise in treating various malignant tumors.
  • A recent study examined the effectiveness of combining APS with the GS chemotherapy regimen in 97 pancreatic cancer patients, comparing those who received combination therapy to those who solely received GS.
  • Results showed the combined APS and GS therapy led to better response rates, improved immune function, and fewer adverse side effects compared to GS alone, indicating a potential benefits for long-term survival.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!