Purpose: The effect of various doses of methylphenidate on the binding of [(123)I]iodobenzamide ([(123)I]IBZM) to the rat D(2) receptor was assessed using small animal SPECT.

Methods: D(2) receptor binding was measured at baseline and after pretreatment with various doses of methylphenidate. For baseline and methylphenidate challenge, striatal equilibrium ratios (V(3)″) were computed as an estimation of the binding potential.

Results: After methylphenidate, striatal V(3)″ was 1.61 ± 0.61 (mean ± SD; 0.3 mg/kg), 0.91 ± 0.44 (3 mg/kg), 1.01 ± 0.44 (10 mg/kg), 0.91 ± 0.34 (30 mg/kg) and 0.99 ± 0.51 (60 mg/kg). Baseline values amounted to 1.73 ± 0.48, 1.32 ± 0.35, 1.50 ± 0.27, 1.82 ± 0.55 and 1.66 ± 0.41, respectively. Differences between baseline and methylphenidate were significant for the doses 3, 10, 30 and 60 mg/kg, whereas no significant difference was obtained for 0.3 mg/kg methylphenidate. Between-group differences of percentage reduction of D(2) receptor binding were only significant for the groups pretreated with 0.3 and 30 mg/kg methylphenidate, respectively.

Conclusion: Methylphenidate between 0.3 and 60 mg/kg decreased D(2) receptor binding with a maximum reduction after 30 mg/kg. As no between-group differences were evident between the groups pretreated with 3, 10, 30 and 60 mg/kg, it may be inferred that doses ≥ 3 mg/kg were sufficient to induce maximum dopamine concentration in the synaptic cleft. Further investigations are needed in order to clarify whether the variation between subjects can be accounted for by different synaptic mechanisms at the presynaptic binding site.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1668-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

doses methylphenidate
12
receptor binding
12
methylphenidate
9
binding [123i]iodobenzamide
8
rat receptor
8
small animal
8
baseline methylphenidate
8
between-group differences
8
groups pretreated
8
binding
7

Similar Publications

Methylphenidate-effects on orthodontic tooth movement, orthodontically induced and nonorthodontic root resorption? : A micro-computed tomography and immunohistochemical analysis.

J Orofac Orthop

January 2025

Department of Molecular Medicine, Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Istanbul University, Topkapı, Gureba Hastanesi Cd, No. 69, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of methylphenidate, prescribed for individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and root resorption.

Methods: In all, 30 rats were divided into (1) control (C), (2) constant (MCD), and (3) increasing dose of methylphenidate (MID) groups and 2 subgroups for each of them (nonorthodontic (30 days)/orthodontic (44 days)). After receiving saline or methylphenidate for 30 days, rats in the nonorthodontic groups were euthanized (n = 5/group).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, and methylphenidate are central stimulant drugs widely used to treat Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but poor adherence may lead to treatment failure and the drugs are also subject to misuse and diversion. Drug analysis in oral fluid may thus be useful for monitoring adherence and misuse. We measured drug concentrations in oral fluid and urine after controlled dosing to investigate detection windows and evaluate the chosen cut-offs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rationale: Psychostimulants, such as amphetamine (AMPH) and methylphenidate (MPH), non-selectively elevate extracellular concentrations of the catecholamine neurotransmitters, dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE), and are common pharmacological strategies used to improve prefrontal cortex (PFC)-dependent cognitive dysfunction. However, this approach can be problematic given AMPH has been shown to increase preference for risky choices in a rodent assay of risk/reward decision making. SK609 is a novel NE reuptake blocker that selectively activates DA D3 receptors without affinity for the DA transporter.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Methylphenidate (MPH), often used to treat ADHD, is increasingly misused by individuals with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders, raising concerns about dependence and adverse effects.
  • - A systematic review conducted in 2024 analyzed 12 studies, focusing on patterns of MPH misuse among patients with various psychiatric disorders, including conduct, mood, and anxiety disorders.
  • - The results showed a significant correlation between MPH misuse and individuals with psychiatric disorders, particularly those also suffering from Alcohol Use Disorder, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and monitoring.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Deficits in cognitive control are implicated in numerous neuropsychiatric disorders. However, relevant pharmacological treatments are limited, likely due to weak translational validity of applicable preclinical models used. Neural indices derived from electroencephalography may prove useful in comparing and translating the effects of cognition-enhancing drugs between species.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!