A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A comparison of experimental and DFT calculations of ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR shielding trends for [PtX(n)Y(6-n)](2-) (X, Y = Cl, Br, F and I) anions. | LitMetric

A comparison between experimental and calculated gas-phase as well as the conductor-like screening model DFT (195)Pt chemical shifts of a series of octahedral [PtX(6-n)Y(n)](2-) complexes for X = Cl, Br, F, I was carried out to assess the accuracy of computed NMR shielding and to gain insight into the dominant σ(dia), σ(para) and σ(SO) shielding contributions. The discrepancies between the experimental and the DFT-calculated (195)Pt chemical shifts vary for these complexes as a function of the coordinated halide ions, the largest being obtained for the fluorido-chlorido and fluorido-bromido complexes, while negligible discrepancies are found for the [PtCl(6-n)Br(n)](2-) series; the discrepancies are somewhat larger where a significant deviation from the ideal octahedral symmetry such as for the geometric cis/trans or fac/mer isomers of [PtF(6-n)Cl(n)](2-) and [PtF(6-n)Br(n)](2-) may be expected. The discrepancies generally increase in the order [PtCl(6-n)Br(n)](2-) < [PtBr(6-n)I(n)](2-) < [PtCl(6-n)I(n)](2-) < [PtF(6-n)Br(n)](2-) ≈ [PtF(6-n)Cl(n)](2-), and show a striking correlation with the increase in electronegativity difference Δχ between the two halide ligands (X(-) and Y(-)) bound to Pt(IV) for these anions: 0.09 < 0.52 < 0.63 < 1.36 ≈ 1.27, respectively. The computed (195)Pt sensitivity to Pt-X bond displacement, ∂(δ(195)Pt)/∂(ΔPt-X), of these complexes is very large and depends on the halide ion, decreasing from 24 800, 18 300, 15 700 to 12 000 ppm/Å for [PtF(6)](2-), [PtCl(6)](2-), [PtBr(6)](2-) and [PtI(6)](2-), respectively.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrc.2607DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

comparison experimental
8
nmr shielding
8
195pt chemical
8
chemical shifts
8
experimental dft
4
dft calculations
4
calculations ¹⁹⁵pt
4
¹⁹⁵pt nmr
4
shielding trends
4
trends [ptxny6-n]2-
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!