Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of doctors at diagnosing co-morbid psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

Design: Case series comparing clinical diagnoses with a standardized structured psychiatric interview.

Setting: Secondary care specialist chronic fatigue syndrome clinic.

Participants: One hundred and thirty-five participants of a randomized controlled trial of non-pharmacological treatments at one centre in the PACE trial.

Main Outcome Measures: Current psychiatric diagnoses made by CFS specialist doctors, compared with current psychiatric diagnoses made independently using a structured psychiatric interview.

Results: Clinicians identified 59 (44%, 95% CI 39-56%) of patients as suffering from a co-morbid psychiatric disorder compared to 76 (56%, CI 53-69%) by structured interview. Depressive and anxiety disorders were most common. Clinicians were twice as likely to miss diagnoses (30 patients, 22%) than misdiagnose them (13, 10%). Psychiatrists were less likely to miss diagnoses than other clinicians, but were as likely to misdiagnose them.

Conclusions: Doctors assessing patients in a chronic fatigue syndrome clinic miss psychiatric diagnoses more often than misdiagnosing them. Missed diagnoses are common. CFS clinic doctors should be trained to diagnose psychiatric disorders.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2984352PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2010.010042DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chronic fatigue
16
fatigue syndrome
16
patients chronic
12
psychiatric diagnoses
12
psychiatric
9
co-morbid psychiatric
8
psychiatric disorders
8
structured psychiatric
8
current psychiatric
8
diagnoses
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!