Background: Understanding the effect of adverse events from commonly used agents such as sunitinib in hemodialyzed renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients is important in clinical practice. Despite its clinical relevance, little information has been provided on the safety and toxicity profile of sunitinib when administered in hemodialyzed patients with RCC.
Methods: Six patients undergoing hemodialysis were treated with sunitinib for metastatic RCC between February 2007 and May 2009. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of these patients and examined the administered dose of sunitinib, treatment-related toxicity, and the clinical response to therapy.
Results: The initial dose of sunitinib was 25 mg (cases 1 and 5), 37.5 mg (cases 2 and 3), and 50 mg (cases 4 and 6), respectively. Toxicities greater than grade 3 were observed in cases 3 and 6, and subsequently the dose was reduced in case 6. No patient had to stop sunitinib due to toxicities. Among the 6 patients, 3 (cases 2, 3, and 5) had disease progression after 1, 2, and 2 cycles of sunitinib, respectively. Three patients (cases 1, 4, and 6) had stable disease after 12, 5, and 4 cycles of treatment, respectively, and 2 of them (cases 4 and 6) were still on sunitinib 8 and 7 months, respectively, after the start of treatment.
Conclusions: The toxicity of and response to sunitinib in dialyzed patients seem to be comparable to those in patients with normal renal function. However, due to the limitations of this study, i.e. a small number of participants and lack of pharmacokinetic data, prospective clinical trials with pharmacokinetic studies in a larger cohort of patients are required.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000321033 | DOI Listing |
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Pharmacology and Biostatistics, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Background: Patellar instability is frequently encountered by orthopaedic surgeons. One of the major risk factors of this condition is underlying trochlear dysplasia (TD). Recent trends have indicated the use of multiple procedures to correct patellar instability under these conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Sports Med
January 2025
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Background: Mismatch between osteochondral allograft (OCA) donor and recipient sex has been shown to negatively affect outcomes. This study accounts for additional donor variables and clinically relevant outcomes.
Purpose: To evaluate whether donor sex, age, donor-recipient sex mismatch, and duration of graft storage affect clinical outcomes and failure rates after knee OCA transplantation.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Background: Knee injuries resulting in purely cartilaginous defects are rare, and controversy remains regarding the reliability of chondral-only fixation.
Purpose: To systematically review the literature for fixation methods and outcomes after primary fixation of chondral-only defects within the knee.
Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 5.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Section of Young Adult Hip Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Background: Many studies have examined the prevalence of acetabular version (AV) and femoral version (FV) abnormalities and their effect on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), but few have explored the prevalence and influence of combined version (CV) abnormalities.
Purpose: To (1) describe the distribution of AV, FV, and CV in the largest cohort to date and (2) determine the relationship between AV, FV, and CV and PROs after hip arthroscopy for FAIS.
Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Background: Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) are small-molecule compounds that exert agonist and antagonist effects on androgen receptors in a tissue-specific fashion. Because of their performance-enhancing implications, SARMs are increasingly abused by athletes. To date, SARMs have no Food and Drug Administration approved use, and recent case reports associate the use of SARMs with deleterious effects such as drug-induced liver injury, myocarditis, and tendon rupture.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!