A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Spinocerebellar projections from the cervical and lumbosacral enlargements in the chicken spinal cord. | LitMetric

In birds, spinocerebellar (SC) projections to the cerebellar cortex have not been understood well. We examined SC fiber terminal fields originating from the cervical and lumbosacral enlargements (CE and LSE, respectively) in the chicken. SC fiber terminals show parasagittal bands in the granular layer. Labeled terminals from the CE were distributed primarily in folia II-V and IX. Parasagittal bands of labeled terminals from the CE were not clearly separated in folia II and III but were clearly separated in folia IV and V. In folium IX, labeled terminals were diffusely distributed in all subfolia with no evidence of banding. The numbers of bands were 5 in folium II, 12 in folium III and 7 in folia IV and V at maximum. Labeled terminals from the LSE were distributed primarily in folia II-VI and IX. Labeled terminals from the LSE were arranged in 4 bands in folium II and in 8 bands in folium III at maximum. Parasagittal bands from the LSE in folia IV and V were not clearly separated. In folium VI, the numbers of parasagittal bands was 6 at maximum. In folium IX, labeled terminals were mainly found in subfolium IXc forming 6-8 parasagittal bands. There were more parasagittal bands of labeled terminals from the CE than from the LSE. The topography of SC fiber terminals from the CE was different from that of SC fiber terminals from the LSE.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000321910DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

labeled terminals
28
parasagittal bands
24
terminals lse
16
fiber terminals
12
clearly separated
12
bands folium
12
terminals
10
bands
9
spinocerebellar projections
8
cervical lumbosacral
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!