Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Previous studies demonstrated that ventricular response to stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is frequently abnormal in patients with a systemic right ventricle (RV). However, the clinical implications of these findings remained unknown. We sought to evaluate whether abnormal response to stress CMR predicts adverse outcome in patients with a systemic RV.
Methods: Thirty-nine adult patients (54% male; mean age 26, range 18-65 years) with a systemic RV underwent stress CMR to determine the response of RV volumes and ejection fraction (EF). During follow-up, cardiac events, defined as hospitalization for heart failure, cardiac surgery, aborted cardiac arrest, or death, were recorded. The prognostic value of an abnormal response to stress, defined as lack of a decrease in RV end-systolic volume (ESV) or lack of an increase in RV EF, was assessed.
Results: We frequently observed an abnormal response to stress, as RV ESV did not decrease in 17 patients (44%), and RV EF did not increase in 15 patients (38%). After a mean follow-up period of 8.1 years, 8 (21%) patients had reached the composite end point. The inability to decrease RV ESV during stress was predictive for cardiac events with a hazard ratio of 2.3 (95% CI 1.19-88.72, P = .034), as was the inability to increase RV EF with a hazard ratio of 2.3 (95% CI 1.31-81.59, P = .027).
Conclusions: Stress CMR potentially has important prognostic value in patients with a systemic RV. Patients with a systemic RV who show abnormal cardiac response to stress have a substantially higher risk of adverse outcome.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.015 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!