AI Article Synopsis

  • Annual evaluations of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) are important due to changes in the virus and vaccine formulation.
  • This study compared two methods for assessing VE: an active surveillance group using rRT-PCR testing and a clinical testing group relying on clinician-ordered tests.
  • Results showed that VE estimates from clinical testing underestimated those from active surveillance by 5-33%, highlighting the need for improved methodologies in measuring vaccine effectiveness.

Article Abstract

Annual evaluation of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) is needed to assess ongoing impact of immunization efforts in the setting of antigenic drift and periodic vaccine reformulation. Optimal methodology for determining VE remains unclear. We compared influenza VE generated from prospective enrollment and rRT-PCR testing (active surveillance group) with VE based on clinician-ordered diagnostic tests (clinical testing group) in a defined population over four seasons. VE was calculated as (1 - adjusted OR) for vaccination in cases vs. test-negative controls. VE based on clinical testing underestimated VE based on active surveillance and testing with rRT-PCR by 5-33% depending on season.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.082DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

active surveillance
12
influenza vaccine
8
vaccine effectiveness
8
surveillance testing
8
clinical testing
8
testing
5
comparison influenza
4
effectiveness methods
4
methods case
4
case detection
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!