Due to the increasing number of total hip arthroplasties performed during the last three decades and the limited long-term survival, mainly because of wear, the number of revisions has increased during the last two years. If the implant itself is still considered to be stable, only head and inlay exchange is necessary. This requires comprehensive knowledge of the characteristics of the articulating materials by the surgeon as the wrong choice of wear couple can lead to early failure for a second time. The aim of this paper is to present considerations and strategies for head and inlay exchange in case of failure, either due to wear of the articulation material or of other indications for revision hip arthroplasty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3032102PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1164-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

head inlay
12
inlay exchange
12
strategies head
8
revision hip
8
hip arthroplasty
8
exchange revision
4
arthroplasty increasing
4
increasing number
4
number total
4
total hip
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!