Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Restenosis is the usual mechanism of recurrent myocardial ischaemia in the months following successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Control coronary arteriography may occasionally show another cause: the constitution of a new stenosis near the dilated segment or in the left main coronary stem after angioplasty in a branch of this artery. The authors report 4 cases of patients who developed new coronary stenoses within a few weeks of PTCA, interpreted as traumatic complications of the initial procedure due to a lesion of the intima with a secondary fibrotic reaction and luminal narrowing. The guiding catheter was probably responsible for the trauma to the left main coronary stem whereas the tips of either the balloon catheter or the guide wire were thought to have been responsible for the endothelial effraction of the dilated vessels.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!