Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This article describes the need for incurred sample reanalysis and suggests that the combination of a Bland-Altman plot and tolerance intervals can provide a visual evaluation of method performance. It also shows how the proposed combination is a tool that may be of value in determining minimum sample size. An example dataset is worked through in its entirety so that a reader unfamiliar with the topic can gain sufficient information to analyze their own data. Related topics include the generation of 66.7% tolerance factors, comparison of mean-normalized and log differences and the use of probability plots to evaluate error distributions. The suggestions presented in this article are meant to be a continuation of the ongoing incurred sample reanalysis discussion and, as such, further comment is invited.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4155/bio.09.79 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!