Objectives: To evaluate the early results of unilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique in lumbar discectomy cases compared with simple discectomy and bilateral posterior interbody fusion cases using visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry outcomes instruments and radiological and physical examinations.
Methods: The control group had 40 patients who underwent simple discectomy. In group one, 8 patients had recurrent disc herniations and facet joint hypertrophy, 21 patients had degenerative disc disease and facet joint hypertrophy. In this group polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage was used for protecting the disc height and recurrence. In group 2, 15 patients had degenerative lumbar disc herniations and bilateral facet joint hypertrophy. All patients were operated upon between October 2002 between February 2004 at the Neurosurgery Department of Kocatepe University Medical School, and were followed by the help of radiological exams, VAS and Oswestry scores, and clinical exams. The groups were compared to each other statistically.
Results: In the control group (n=40) there were recurrences and disc height loss. In group one (n=29) there were no recurrences and the height lost was limited. In group 2, (n=15) there was no recurrence, however, the lost disc height was more than group one.
Conclusion: If the patient has degenerative disc disease, the use of unilateral posterior PEEK cage and interbody grafting is a safer mode of treatment after discectomy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Global Spine J
January 2025
Department of orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Global Spine J
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Front Med (Lausanne)
December 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Background: Cage subsidence frequently complicates lumbar fusion procedures, including lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), potentially leading to recurrent pain, impaired fusion, and accelerated degeneration of adjacent segments. A critical factor influencing cage subsidence is the selection of material. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and three-dimensional printed titanium (3D-Ti) cages are commonly used in LLIF procedures, each offering distinct advantages.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Bioeng Biotechnol
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Objective: In the current study, to demonstrate the advantages of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), we focused on the therapeutics for lumbar spinal tuberculosis with the comparison of three treatments, including anterior approach, posterior approach, and OLIF combined with posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.
Methods: This study included patients with lumbar spinal tuberculosis from July 2015 to June 2018. We divided these patients into three groups: 35 patients underwent an anterior-only approach (Group A), 36 patients underwent a posterior-only approach (Group B), and 31 patients underwent OLIF combined with posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (Group C).
Purpose: Synthetic cages are commonly used in posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Using morselized corticocancellous bone from spinous processes and laminae has been suggested as an alternative, especially in low-resource settings where access to synthetic cages is limited. The aim of this study was to compare radiographic and functional outcomes of synthetic cages with those of morselized local autograft.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!