A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Doubling of serum creatinine: is it appropriate as the endpoint for CKD? Proposal of a new surrogate endpoint based on the reciprocal of serum creatinine. | LitMetric

Background: The evaluation of the progression of renal insufficiency, or decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), has been approached more simply and precisely by converting measured serum creatinine value into the reciprocal of serum creatinine, estimated GFR, or other parameters. Doubling of serum creatinine (simple doubling) is conveniently used as a surrogate endpoint for progression of renal disease but is thought to be biased unfairly by the initial value of serum creatinine (Scr(Int)). We proposed the definite decline in the reciprocal of serum creatinine (2-4 doubling) as a surrogate endpoint, comparing simple doubling with this new endpoint to verify the effect of Scr(Int) on the endpoint.

Methods: For the purpose of comparison between endpoints, 194 patients in a historical cohort of chronic glomerulonephritis were investigated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with the composite endpoint of need for dialysis and either simple doubling or 2-4 doubling. Then, the distribution of Scr(Int) was compared between total patients and patients developing each endpoint.

Results: The endpoint value of serum creatinine (Scr(End)) with 2-4 doubling was lower than that with simple doubling at Scr(Int) <2.00 mg/dl, and the difference of Scr(End) between simple doubling and 2-4 doubling was larger, as Scr(Int) became lower. In patients reaching simple doubling, Scr(Int) was higher than that of the total patients (1.66 vs. 1.07 mg/dl in median, respectively; p < 0.001). In patients reaching 2-4 doubling, there was no significant difference in Scr(Int).

Conclusion: Patients with low serum creatinine concentration at baseline had a tendency of prolonged development into simple doubling. In contrast, with 2-4 doubling, there was no bias of Scr(Int).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10157-010-0365-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

serum creatinine
32
simple doubling
16
surrogate endpoint
12
reciprocal serum
12
2-4 doubling
12
doubling
9
doubling serum
8
creatinine
8
progression renal
8
endpoint
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!