Background: The management of carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the penis is controversial, with relatively high local recurrence rates after minimally invasive therapies.
Objective: Report the surgical technique and outcome of partial glans resurfacing (PGR) and total glans resurfacing (TGR) as primary treatment modalities for CIS of the glans penis.
Design, Setting, And Participants: Between 2001 to 2010, 25 patients with biopsy-proven CIS underwent TGR (n=10) or PGR (n=15), defined as <50% of the glans requiring resurfacing. All patients were surveyed clinically every 3 mo for 2 yr and every 6 mo thereafter.
Surgical Procedure: Excision of the glans epithelium and subepithelium of either the entire glans or the locally affected area, with a macroscopic clear margin. The penis was then reconstructed using a split skin graft.
Measurements: Positive surgical margin (PSM) rates and rates of recurrence and progression were collated. Complications, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.
Results And Limitations: Mean follow-up was 29 mo (range: 2-120 mo). There were no postoperative complications, and 24 of 25 patients (96%) had complete graft take with excellent cosmesis. Overall, 12 of 25 patients (48%) had PSMs. Only 7 of 25 (28%) required further surgery, 2 of 25 (8%) for extensive CIS at the margin and 5 of 25 (20%) for unexpected invasive disease. Additional surgery consisted of further resurfacing in 4 of 25 cases (16%) or glansectomy in 3 of 25 cases (12%). Those undergoing further surgery had no further compromise to their oncologic outcome. The overall local recurrence rate was 4%. There were no cases of progression.
Conclusions: Glans resurfacing is a safe and effective primary treatment for CIS. The procedure maintains a functional penis without compromising oncologic control, while ensuring that definitive histopathlogy is obtained. Glans resurfacing has a low risk of recurrence and progression. Patients need to be warned that approximately 28% will require further surgery for PSM or understaging of their primary disease, although the need for further surgery does not compromise oncologic control.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.039 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
September 2024
Department of General Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Penile intraepithelial neoplasia is a rare presentation in Asian males. It is usually observed as small lesions in the penis. It primarily influences the penetrative sexual intercourse ability and urination.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Impot Res
August 2024
Urology Clinic-A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
The first-line treatment of penile cancer confined to the glans (Tis-T2) is based on organ-sparing approaches. Our aim is to report functional outcomes of total glans resurfacing (TGR), wide local excision (WLE) and glansectomy. A retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2013 to October 2022.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
July 2024
School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Local therapy for penile cancer provides robust survival and can preserve the penis functionally and cosmetically. Interventions must target the appropriate clinical stage. We reviewed studies regarding the primary therapy in penile cancer, from topical therapy to radical penectomy, and reconstructive techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Urol Focus
May 2024
Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.
Surgeon
October 2024
Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; National Cancer Control Programme, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Introduction: Penile cancer is a rare urological malignancy with an age-standardised incidence of 0.8 per 100,000 person-years [1]. Given this low incidence it has been suggested that centralised care may improve patient outcomes in relation to phallus sparing surgery and nodal assessment [2].
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!