AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores the effectiveness of surgical techniques, partial glans resurfacing (PGR) and total glans resurfacing (TGR), for treating carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the penis.
  • Results showed that the procedures had a 4% local recurrence rate and no significant postoperative complications, with most patients satisfied with the cosmetic outcome.
  • The findings suggest that glans resurfacing is a reliable treatment option that preserves penile function while ensuring effective disease management.

Article Abstract

Background: The management of carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the penis is controversial, with relatively high local recurrence rates after minimally invasive therapies.

Objective: Report the surgical technique and outcome of partial glans resurfacing (PGR) and total glans resurfacing (TGR) as primary treatment modalities for CIS of the glans penis.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Between 2001 to 2010, 25 patients with biopsy-proven CIS underwent TGR (n=10) or PGR (n=15), defined as <50% of the glans requiring resurfacing. All patients were surveyed clinically every 3 mo for 2 yr and every 6 mo thereafter.

Surgical Procedure: Excision of the glans epithelium and subepithelium of either the entire glans or the locally affected area, with a macroscopic clear margin. The penis was then reconstructed using a split skin graft.

Measurements: Positive surgical margin (PSM) rates and rates of recurrence and progression were collated. Complications, cosmesis, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

Results And Limitations: Mean follow-up was 29 mo (range: 2-120 mo). There were no postoperative complications, and 24 of 25 patients (96%) had complete graft take with excellent cosmesis. Overall, 12 of 25 patients (48%) had PSMs. Only 7 of 25 (28%) required further surgery, 2 of 25 (8%) for extensive CIS at the margin and 5 of 25 (20%) for unexpected invasive disease. Additional surgery consisted of further resurfacing in 4 of 25 cases (16%) or glansectomy in 3 of 25 cases (12%). Those undergoing further surgery had no further compromise to their oncologic outcome. The overall local recurrence rate was 4%. There were no cases of progression.

Conclusions: Glans resurfacing is a safe and effective primary treatment for CIS. The procedure maintains a functional penis without compromising oncologic control, while ensuring that definitive histopathlogy is obtained. Glans resurfacing has a low risk of recurrence and progression. Patients need to be warned that approximately 28% will require further surgery for PSM or understaging of their primary disease, although the need for further surgery does not compromise oncologic control.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glans resurfacing
12
carcinoma situ
8
surgical technique
8
glans
4
resurfacing treatment
4
treatment carcinoma
4
situ penis
4
penis surgical
4
technique outcomes
4
outcomes background
4

Similar Publications

Penile intraepithelial neoplasia is a rare presentation in Asian males. It is usually observed as small lesions in the penis. It primarily influences the penetrative sexual intercourse ability and urination.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Functional outcomes of organ sparing surgery for penile cancer confined to glans and premalignant lesions.

Int J Impot Res

August 2024

Urology Clinic-A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza" - Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

The first-line treatment of penile cancer confined to the glans (Tis-T2) is based on organ-sparing approaches. Our aim is to report functional outcomes of total glans resurfacing (TGR), wide local excision (WLE) and glansectomy. A retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2013 to October 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Local therapy for penile cancer provides robust survival and can preserve the penis functionally and cosmetically. Interventions must target the appropriate clinical stage. We reviewed studies regarding the primary therapy in penile cancer, from topical therapy to radical penectomy, and reconstructive techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Penile Shaft Sparing Surgery for Localised Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Eur Urol Focus

May 2024

Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.

Article Synopsis
  • Penile shaft sparing (PSS) surgery is performed for localized penile cancer, aiming to achieve a balance between cancer control and preserving sexual function.
  • A systematic review evaluated various PSS techniques and found that while oncological outcomes were generally good, most studies had a high risk of bias and lacked comparative data.
  • Overall, patient satisfaction regarding sexual function and quality of life was high after surgery, although the studies reviewed were of low quality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Phallus preservation and reconstruction: 5-year outcomes of national penile cancer centralisation in the Republic of Ireland.

Surgeon

October 2024

Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; National Cancer Control Programme, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Introduction: Penile cancer is a rare urological malignancy with an age-standardised incidence of 0.8 per 100,000 person-years [1]. Given this low incidence it has been suggested that centralised care may improve patient outcomes in relation to phallus sparing surgery and nodal assessment [2].

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!