Background: Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce ischemic complications in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) who undergo invasive procedures. However the optimal timing of therapy (upstream - at hospital admission in all patients prior to coronary catheterization, or downstream - after coronary angiography selectively in patients prior to percutaneous coronary intervention) is still debated. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcome of NSTEACS patients randomized to routine upstream versus deferred selective downstream GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Methods: We scanned the literature from January 1990 to May 2009 to identify all randomized trials comparing upstream administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors versus its downstream use in invasively managed NSTEACS.

Results: In 5 randomized trials a total of 9753 patients were randomized to upstream GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors therapy versus 9716 patients randomized to deferred selective downstream therapy. Upstream therapy was associated with reduced in-hospital or 30-day major adverse ischemic cardiac events (odds ratio=0.90 [95% confidence interval 0.82-0.98], p=0.02). However the risk of major bleeding was significantly higher with upstream therapy (odds ratio=1.35 [1.11-1.63], p=0.002). Combining ischemic and hemorrhagic events in a net clinical end-point showed no significant differences between the two approaches (odds ratio=1.01 [0.92-1.10], p=0.88).

Conclusions: In conclusion early administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in NSTEACS is associated with significant reduction in ischemic events compared to a selective deferred therapy after coronary angiography. However upstream therapy is also associated with increased bleeding complications. This approach should therefore be reserved for patients at high ischemic and/or low hemorrhagic risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iib/iiia inhibitors
20
selective downstream
12
randomized trials
12
patients randomized
12
upstream therapy
12
routine upstream
8
upstream versus
8
glycoprotein iib/iiia
8
patients
8
patients non-st-elevation
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Current guidelines recommend the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GpIIb/IIIa) inhibitors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) only as a bail-out therapy. However, drug penetration to the jeopardised area may not be achieved due to impeded blood flow and increased microvascular resistance. Aim of our study is to investigate the impact of distal intracoronary GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor agent infusion in STEMI patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on identifying risk factors for stent thrombosis (ST) in patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI, using data from the TOTAL trial involving over 10,000 patients.
  • Out of the participants, 1.54% experienced ST within a year, with factors like prior heart attacks, number of stents, and certain medications influencing risk.
  • The findings suggest that while ST remains a common complication, different predictors exist for ST occurring at different times after the procedure, emphasizing the need for tailored preventive strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Tirofiban is a fast-acting glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitor that inhibits the final common pathway to platelet aggregation and has been studied as adjuvant therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Since the prior meta-analysis new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published. This meta-analysis aimed to update the current knowledge on the efficacy of tirofiban for patients with AIS not submitted to reperfusion therapies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban has been shown to prevent thromboembolic events during endovascular procedures, but the benefits and risks of its prophylactic early intraprocedural administration for stand-alone coil embolization of acutely ruptured aneurysms are still unclear. We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of patients treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with stand-alone coil embolization. Two study cohorts were compared according to the primary prophylactic antithrombotic medication during the procedure: patients receiving only intravenous heparin (HEP) versus patients receiving tirofiban in addition to heparin prior to final aneurysm obliteration (HEP + TF).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y12-receptor inhibitor, is compared to traditional antithrombotic medications like eptifibatide in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomies (EVTs), with previous data being insufficient for direct comparison.
  • A study reviewed clinical data from 1010 EVT patients who received either cangrelor or eptifibatide to assess safety and efficacy, focusing on outcomes like hemorrhagic conversion and functional status using scales like the mRS and NIHSS.
  • Results showed that cangrelor was linked to a lower risk of hemorrhagic conversion and better functional outcomes at discharge and follow-up, indicating its potential benefits over GPIs in this specific medical context
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!