Objective: To investigate effects of systemic red light therapy on wound repair of burned patients and discuss its possible mechanisms of wound healing promotion.

Methods: 138 burned patients were randomly divided into systemic red light treatment group (n = 69) and control group (n = 69). Patients in control group received routine therapy, while those in test group were given systemic red light therapy once a day, 30 minutes at a time until the wounds were recovered. The clinical findings and variables indicating wound repair were assessed on the 7th, 10th, 14th day, 21st day post-burn and the day when the wounds were healed.

Results: Mean time of wound recovery were 19.86 +/- 2.43 days and 21.02 +/- 2.97 days respectively of those deep-thickness wounds in test group and control group, with statistically significance (P < 0.05). For the severity of the pain, VAS during time of dressing change on the 10th, 14th day post burn was lower in test group than that in control group which indicated less painful in test group (P < 0.05), suggesting pain relief effect of systemic red light therapy.

Conclusion: Systemic red light therapy was effective to promote wound healing of deep-thickness burn wounds and other similar acute wounds. Simultaneously, it is efficacious in pain relief and safe for those patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systemic red
24
red light
24
light therapy
16
control group
16
test group
16
group control
12
group
9
wound repair
8
burned patients
8
wound healing
8

Similar Publications

Preclinical evaluation of several polymeric micelles identifies Soluplus®-docetaxel as the most effective candidate in multiple glioblastoma models.

J Control Release

March 2025

Clinical Biochemistry, Drug Delivery and Therapy Group (CB-DDT), Vall d'Hebron Institut of Research (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; Functional Validation & Preclinical Research (FVPR)/U20 ICTS Nanbiosis, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08035 Barcelona, Spain; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology and Physicochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Av. de Joan XXIII, 27-31, 08028 Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address:

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most lethal cancers, with limited treatment options due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), systemic toxicity, and treatment resistance. Nanomedicine offers potential solutions to these challenges. This study explores Pluronic® F127 and Soluplus®-based micelles as carriers for Lomustine, Gefitinib, and Docetaxel to determine the optimal system for GBM therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The pathogenesis of female pelvic floor polypropylene mesh complications is unclear as trials evaluating explanted mesh have not included asymptomatic controls.

Objectives: To compare explanted polypropylene mesh from those with and without mesh complications to determine the pathogenesis of the complications.

Methods: Between August 2019 and July 2020 66 participants attending Wesley and Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Urogynecology department with mesh complications and 15 undergoing repeat prolapse and/or continence surgery after prior polypropylene mesh implantation were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

SOS1 inhibitor BI-3406 shows in vivo antitumor activity akin to genetic ablation and synergizes with a KRAS inhibitor in KRAS LUAD.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

March 2025

Laboratorio 1. Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad de Salamanca and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Salamanca 37007, Spain.

We evaluated the in vivo therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of BI-3406-mediated pharmacological inhibition of SOS1 in comparison to genetic ablation of this universal Ras-GEF in various KRAS-dependent experimental tumor settings. Contrary to the rapid lethality caused by SOS1 genetic ablation in SOS2 mice, SOS1 pharmacological inhibition by its specific inhibitor BI-3406 did not significantly affect animal weight/viability nor cause noteworthy systemic toxicity. Allograft assays using different KRAS cell lines showed that treatment with BI-3406 impaired RAS activation and RAS downstream signaling and decreased tumor burden and disease progression as a result of both tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic therapeutic effects of the drug.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is recommended as a first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). A subgroup analysis of the IMbrave150 trial showed shorter overall survival (OS) in uHCC patients with stable disease (SD) than patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Improving OS in patients with SD is an unmet medical need.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia are important health problems in Middle Eastern countries. Transfusion is the cornerstone of the management in these disorders, and red blood cell alloimmunization is among the well-recognized adverse effects associated with it. We reviewed the literature on published studies on alloimmunization prevalence, its associated risk factors, and transfusion policies employed in these countries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!