Handover after pediatric heart surgery: a simple tool improves information exchange.

Pediatr Crit Care Med

Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Published: May 2011

AI Article Synopsis

  • * A total of 33 healthcare professionals used the tool during 31 handovers, resulting in a significant improvement in the total handover score and specific information areas without extending the time taken for handover.
  • * Although there was a trend indicating fewer high-risk postoperative events in the group using the tool, the improvement wasn't statistically significant.

Article Abstract

Objective: To improve the quality of handover of complex patients after pediatric cardiac surgery through the use of a simple handover tool.

Design: Prospective, pre-/postinterventional.

Setting: A tertiary care, pediatric intensive care unit in North America.

Subjects: Thirty-three consenting healthcare providers from pediatric cardiac anesthesia, critical care, and cardiothoracic surgery participating in 31 handovers.

Intervention: A fill-in-the-blank, one-page tool was developed to guide the information transmitted by the surgeon and anesthesiologist to the pediatric intensive care unit team during handover of postcardiac surgery patients.

Measurements And Main Results: Total handover score, four subscores, handover duration, and postoperative high-risk events were measured before and after introducing the tool into clinical practice. The patients in both the pre- and postintervention groups were similar at baseline. The total handover score (maximum 43 points) improved significantly after the implementation of the handover tool (28.2 of 43 ± 4.6 points vs. 33.5 of 43 ± 3.7 points, p = .002). There was also a significant improvement in the medical (8.3 ± 2.6 vs. 10.3 ± 2.1 points, p = .024) and surgical (7.5 ± 1.4 vs. 9.3 ± 1.6 points, p = .002) intraoperative information subscores. Use of the tool did not prolong handover duration (8.3 ± 4.6 vs. 11.1 ± 3.9 mins, p = .1). There was a trend toward more patients being free from high-risk events in the postintervention group (31.2% vs. 6.7%), but this did not reach statistical significance (p = .1).

Conclusions: Use of a simple tool during handover of pediatric postcardiac surgery patients resulted in a more complete exchange of critical information with no significant prolongation of the handover duration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181fe27b6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

handover duration
12
handover
11
handover pediatric
8
surgery simple
8
simple tool
8
pediatric cardiac
8
pediatric intensive
8
intensive care
8
care unit
8
postcardiac surgery
8

Similar Publications

Background: The handover and associated shift start checks by nurses of critical care patients are complex and prone to errors. However, which aspects lead to errors remains unknown. Fewer errors might occur in a structured approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: High-quality health information handovers are critical to optimal patient care and trainee education. The purposes of this study were to assess the feasibility of implementing an emergency general surgery (EGS) morning handover and to explore its impact upon markers of clinical care.

Methods: This prospective feasibility study was conducted at a single academic tertiary-care medical center following implementation of a novel EGS morning handover process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: We evaluated the effectiveness and implementability of a standardized EHR-integrated handoff report to support intraoperative handoffs.

Materials And Methods: A pre-post intervention study was used to compare the quality of intraoperative handoffs supported by unstructured notes (pre) to structured, standardized EHR-integrated handoff reports (post). Participants included anesthesia clinicians involved in intraoperative handoffs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: A rapid response team (RRT) evaluates and manages patients at risk of clinical deterioration. There is limited literature on the structure of the rapid response encounter from the floor to the intensive care unit team. We aimed to define this encounter and examine provider experiences to elucidate what information healthcare staff need to safely manage patients during an RRT evaluation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Clinical handover is an essential step in the surgical patient's hospital journey, but one that is not without risk. Within cardiothoracic surgery, endeavours to protocolise post-operative handover from cardiac theatre to cardiac intensive care units have resulted in enhanced patient safety, but little to no effort has focused on the pre-operative setting and the dissemination of information throughout the surgical team.

Methods: We designed a pre-post study examining the quality of pre-operative cardiothoracic patient handovers before and after the introduction of an intra-departmentally designed "Cardiothoracic Clinical Handover Tool" based on the Royal College of Surgeons of England's guidelines for "Safe Handover".

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!