Replicating the attenuation properties of the treatment tabletop are of primary importance for accurate treatment planning; however, the effect of the tabletop on the skin-sparing properties of x-rays can be overlooked. Under some conditions, the reaction of skin to the radiation can be so serious as to be the dose-limiting organ for radiotherapy treatment. Hence, an understanding of the magnitude of the reduction in skin sparing is important. Because of the development of image-guided radiotherapy, modern tabletops have been developed without the use of metal supports that otherwise provided the necessary level of rigidity. Rigidity is instead provided by compressed foam within a carbon-fiber shell, which, although it provides artefact-free imaging and high levels of rigidity, has an adverse affect on the dose in the build-up region. Representative of this type is the iBEAM evo tabletop, whose effect on the skin dose was determined at 6-MV, 10-MV, and 18-MV x-rays. Skin dose was found to increase by 60-70% owing to the tabletop, with the effect increasing with field size and decreasing with energy. By considering an endpoint of erythema, a radiobiological advantage of selecting 10 MV over 6 MV for applicable treatments was demonstrated.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2010.07.004 | DOI Listing |
Med Dosim
November 2024
Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504, Patras, Greece. Electronic address:
Recently, carbon fiber (CF) has prevailed as the primary material used in radiotherapy couchtops. Modern couchtops incorporate the CF sandwich design, in which 2 thin CF plates sandwich an air-equivalent polymeric foam. Developments in radiotherapy necessitate irradiation from posterior angles through the couchtop.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPhys Eng Sci Med
December 2023
South Western Sydney Cancer Services, Sydney, Australia.
Accurate radiotherapy treatment planning requires attenuation through the treatment couch to be accounted for in dose calculation. This is commonly performed by using contouring tools to add a virtual structure in the shape of the treatment couch and assigning the preferred absorption properties. The RayStation treatment planning system (TPS) allows users to assign a material that comprises both an elemental structure and a physical density.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Appl Clin Med Phys
January 2018
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
The use of Monte Carlo treatment planning systems (TPS) in radiation therapy has increased the dosimetric accuracy of VMAT treatment sequences. However, this accuracy is compromised by not including the treatment couch into the treatment planning process. Therefore, the impact of the treatment couch on radiation delivery output was determined, and two different couch models (uniform couch model A vs two components model B) were included and tested in the Monaco TPS to investigate which model can better quantify the couch influence on radiation dose.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Dosim
December 2016
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
This study is to demonstrate the importance and a method of properly modeling the treatment couch for dose calculation in patient treatment using arc therapy. The 2 treatment couch tops-Aktina AK550 and Elekta iBEAM evo-of Elekta LINACs were scanned using Philips Brilliance Big Bore CT Simulator. Various parts of the couch tops were contoured, and their densities were measured and recorded on the Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) using the established computed tomography density table.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNoncoplanar radiation fields from a linear accelerator can be used to deliver radiation dose distributions that are superior to those delivered using coplanar radiation fields. Noncoplanar radiation field arrangements are especially valuable when delivering stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Noncoplanar radiation fields, however, are geometrically more challenging to deliver than coplanar radiation fields, and are associated with a greater risk of collisions between the gantry, treatment couch, and patient.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!