Comparison of blood sirolimus, tacrolimus and everolimus concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS, HPLC-UV and immunoassay methods.

Clin Biochem

Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Discipline of Pharmacology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Published: February 2011

Objectives: An LC-MS/MS method was developed for simultaneous quantitation of tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus in whole blood, and compared to HPLC-UV and immunoassay methods.

Design And Methods: Blood (0.1mL) was analysed following solid-phase extraction and chromatographic resolution using a C18 column (45°C) and mobile phase of methanol/40mM ammonium acetate/glacial acetic acid (83/17/0.1) at 200μL/min, with positive electrospray ionisation and multiple reaction monitoring.

Results: Intra- and inter-day imprecision and inaccuracy were ≤12.2% over a 1.5-40μg/L calibration range. An external quality assurance programme confirmed acceptable inaccuracy and imprecision of the LC-MS/MS method, but highlighted problems with immunoassay quantitation, particularly for everolimus, showing a >30% bias in FPIA everolimus concentrations measured in pooled patient samples versus spiked drug-free whole blood.

Conclusions: LC-MS/MS provides significant accuracy and precision advantages compared to HPLC and immunoassays. Discrepancies in everolimus concentrations measured by the Seradyn FPIA immunoassay require further investigation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.10.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

everolimus concentrations
12
concentrations measured
12
hplc-uv immunoassay
8
lc-ms/ms method
8
everolimus
5
comparison blood
4
blood sirolimus
4
sirolimus tacrolimus
4
tacrolimus everolimus
4
lc-ms/ms
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!