In vitro evaluation of the Lithoclast Ultra Vario combination lithotrite.

Urol Res

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Dr. MS 5055, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5120, USA.

Published: December 2010

AI Article Synopsis

  • Rigid intracorporeal lithotrites, like the Lithoclast Ultra Vario, are crucial for removing large kidney stones during percutaneous nephrolithotomy, featuring both an ultrasound probe and a pneumatic-ballistic probe.
  • Testing revealed that extending the ballistic probe improves penetration speed for fixed stones, while retracting it enhances comminution speed for mobile stones.
  • Overall, optimal operation involves extending the probe for stationary stones and retracting it for movable stones, balancing efficiency and effectiveness in different scenarios.

Article Abstract

Rigid intracorporeal lithotrites can be invaluable in the removal of large stone burdens during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. One such device, the Lithoclast Ultra Vario (LUV) has an outer ultrasound probe and inner pneumatic-ballistic probe. The ballistic probe can be advanced or retracted and run at 1-12 Hz. Since it can be difficult to predict optimal settings with any new device, we asked if in vitro testing could give insight into how best to operate this lithotrite. We tested the LUV under hands-free conditions that simulate treatment of fixed stones and freely movable stones. A fixed-stone test system measured the time to penetrate a gypsum model stone placed atop the probe and a movable-stone system determined time for comminution of a stone within a confined space. In addition, the time to evacuate 2-mm stone particles was measured. For hands-on testing, model stones were placed in a plastic dish submerged in water and the time to comminution was measured. Penetration time of fixed stones was faster with the ballistic probe extended 2.5 mm than when retracted (5.30 ± 0.85 vs. 8.75 ± 1.07 s, p < 0.0001). Comminution of free stones was faster with the ballistic probe retracted than when it was extended 1 mm or 2.5 mm (9.7 ± 0.9, 13.8 ± 1.3, 23.7 ± 3.2 s, p < 0.0001). In hands-on testing, extending the ballistic probe substantially reduced the efficiency of comminution (36.7 ± 6.4 vs. 131.3 ± 15.3 s, p < 0.0001). Clearance of fragments was considerably faster when the pneumatic-ballistic rate was 12 Hz compared to 1 Hz (12.3 ± 1.1 vs. 28.3 ± 2.2 s, p < 0.0001). These in vitro findings suggest ways to take advantage of the positive features while minimizing potential limitations of this lithotrite. Extending the ballistic probe is an advantage when the stone is immobile, as would be the case in treating a large stone that can be isolated against the wall of the pelvicalyceal system, but is a distinct disadvantage--due to retropulsion--when the stone is free to move. Operation of the LUV at fast ballistic rate significantly improved its ability to aspirate stone fragments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5901674PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0318-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ballistic probe
20
lithoclast ultra
8
ultra vario
8
stone
8
large stone
8
probe
8
fixed stones
8
time comminution
8
hands-on testing
8
stones faster
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!