Study Design: Prospective radiographic outcome analysis.

Objective: Radiographic evaluation of the rigidity of monocortical and tricortical purchase in lumbosacral fixation.

Summary Of Background Data: The lumbosacral junction continues to be a difficult region to obtain a successful spinal arthrodesis and is one of the primary regions for construct failure. In inserting sacral screws, 3 types of purchase are known: monocortical, bicortical, and tricortical. Among them no clinical or basic studies have compared monocortical with tricortical purchase.

Methods: Ninety consecutive patients diagnosed with spondylolisthesis who underwent lumbosacral fixation were evaluated. Fifty-three patients were treated with a monocortical approach and the other 37 patients were treated with a tricortical approach. Patients underwent surgery for posterolateral fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) according to their diagnosis. Their radiologic findings, radiolucent zones around sacral screws, and lumbosacral instability of more than 2° flexion just after the surgery and 1 year later were compared. The angulation and length of the inserted screw were also measured and evaluated.

Results: There were no significances in the distributions of gender, average age, proportion of fixation method, and fusion range between the monocortical and tricortical groups (P > 0.05). Radiolucent zones and lumbosacral instability were more prevalent in the monocortical group than were in the tricortical group. Smaller angulation also affected the outcome in the monocortical group while screw length did not. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of possible risk factors revealed that female gender (odds ratio [OR]: 3.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-10.8), TLIF operative method (OR: 5.54, 95% CI: 1.08-8.2), number of fusion levels (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.05-3.18), and monocortical purchase (OR: 7.11, 95% CI: 1.58-31.9) were statistically significant.

Conclusion: More loosening of sacral screws was radiographically observed in the monocortical purchase group than in the tricortical group 1 year after the lumbosacral fixation surgery. A statistical analysis indicated that the tricortical approach should be used for patients undergoing multilevel fusion including lumbosacral junction by TLIF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e5092cDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lumbosacral fixation
12
monocortical tricortical
12
sacral screws
12
approach patients
12
monocortical
10
tricortical
9
radiographic evaluation
8
tricortical purchase
8
lumbosacral
8
consecutive patients
8

Similar Publications

Objective: High-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis (HGDS) is a relatively rare condition mainly involving the L5/S1 segment of the spine and occurring in children and adolescents. Whether surgical fixation should be L5-S1 monosegmental or extended up to L4 remains controversial. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and the risk of adjacent segment spondylolisthesis between L5-S1 monosegmental fixation and L4-S1 double-segmental fixation for pediatric HGDS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the impact of using a lower thoracic (LT) versus upper lumbar (UL) level as the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) on clinical and radiographic outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective study design was used. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, and one of the following: coronal Cobb angle > 20°, sagittal vertical axis > 50 mm, pelvic tilt > 20°, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch > 10°.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Pelvic reconstruction after type I + II (or type I + II + III) internal hemipelvectomy with extensive ilium removal is a great challenge. In an attempt to anatomically reconstruct the hip rotation center (HRC) and achieve a low mechanical failure rate, a custom-made, 3D-printed prosthesis with a porous articular interface was developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients treated with this prosthesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare a multiple pelvic screw fixation strategy (dual bilateral 4 pelvic screw fixation [4PvS]) with the use of single bilateral 2 pelvic screw fixation (2PvS), with the aim of addressing lumbosacral junction stability.

Methods: This analysis is a single-center, retrospective review of ASD patients treated between 2015 and 2021. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up and spinal fusion to the sacrum without sacroiliac fusion and met at least one radiographic and procedural criterion: pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis ≥ 20°, T1 pelvic angle ≥ 20°, sagittal vertical axis ≥ 7.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aims to introduce a two-stage surgical procedure, namely oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), for spinal disorders treatment. Furthermore, clinical outcomes and imaging results are analyzed between OLIF with posterior fixation and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with fixation for lumbosacral curve-driven degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).

Methods: 146 patients with type 2 DLS who underwent OLIF or PLIF between January 2019 and November 2023 were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!