Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: While studies demonstrated that bipolar patients (BP) display cognitive deficits during mood episodes and remission, little is known about the clinical influences underlying these deficits. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of euthymic and depressed BPs and non-affective/psychotic disorder controls at several cognitive tasks, exploring which clinical variables influenced the performance of these subtests. It is hypothesized that the cognitive deficits in rank order are: depressed BPs > euthymic BPs > controls.
Methods: Sixty-five bipolar-I outpatients and thirty-four controls were assessed by the Brazilian version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third Edition (WAIS-III). BPs were divided into depressed and euthymics, and these two groups were then compared to non-affective/psychotic disorder controls.
Results: For 12 of 14 subtest scores, comparisons yielded statistically significant (p < 0.05) between-group differences, including three subtests of attention and working memory (Digit Span and its two subtests) with both depressed and euthymic BPs, compared to controls, displaying significantly worse performance, and six subtests of visual and working memory with depressed (but not euthymic) BPs performing worse than controls. For all subtests, comparisons of depressed and euthymic patients' scores were non-significant. Performance on several subtests was negatively predicted by the severity of the disorder in both patient groups.
Limitations: The cross-sectional design of the study, as well as confounding effects of medications and co-morbidities.
Conclusions: The fact that the impairment of cognitive performance of both groups of patients is influenced by the severity of the illness is consistent with the literature.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.09.006 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!