Comparison of quadriceps inactivation between nerve and muscle stimulation.

Muscle Nerve

Institute of Movement Sciences and Sport Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Published: December 2010

We evaluated the use of direct muscle stimulation for quantifying quadriceps inactivation at different contraction levels as opposed to conventional twitch interpolation using nerve stimulation. Fourteen healthy volunteers were tested. Paired stimuli were delivered to the femoral nerve or to the quadriceps muscle belly during voluntary contractions ranging from 20% to 100% of maximum, and the amplitude of the superimposed doublet was quantified to investigate inactivation. Superimposed doublet for muscle and nerve stimulation, respectively between the range of 60% to 100% of maximum (e.g., at 100%, muscle stimulation was 14 ± 5 Nm and nerve stimulation was 15 ± 6 Nm). Despite higher current doses, muscle stimulation was associated with less discomfort than nerve stimulation (P < 0.05). Collectively, our data suggest that direct muscle stimulation could be used to assess quadriceps inactivation at maximal and quasi-maximal contraction levels as a valid alternative to motor nerve stimulation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.21776DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

muscle stimulation
20
nerve stimulation
20
quadriceps inactivation
12
stimulation
10
direct muscle
8
contraction levels
8
100% maximum
8
superimposed doublet
8
nerve
7
muscle
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!