Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Preparative HPLC and HPLC-MS are well established as the methods of choice for purification of pharmaceutical library compounds. Recent advances in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) have now made SFC a viable alternative to HPLC for this application. One of the potential arguments for using SFC in place of, or in addition to, HPLC is that it may offer different selectivity and thus has the potential for improved separation success rates. In this paper, we examine relative success rates for SFC and HPLC in obtaining adequate selectivity for successful separation. Our results suggest that use of SFC in addition to HPLC may result in a slight (1-2%) improvement in success rate compared to use of HPLC alone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cc100118y | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!