Introduction: Female gender has been identified as an independent risk factor for perioperative mortality in several risk scores for cardiac surgery. Since no explanation has been given for this, this study aimed to evaluate potential differences in the distribution of other risk factors between the genders.

Patients And Methods: 10 714 consecutive coronary bypass patients were analyzed retrospectively. The distribution of the risk factors as used in the EuroSCORE was evaluated. Diabetes mellitus was added to the analysis as an additional risk factor. Patients aged between 60 and 70 years without any additional risk factors were directly compared in a subgroup analysis. Statistical analysis was done using the T-test or chi-square test where appropriate.

Results: Female patients were significantly older compared to male ones (69.1 ± 8.5 vs. 65.4 ± 4 years, P < 0.05). The distribution of the analyzed risk factors did not differ except for diabetes mellitus: female patients were more likely to present with diabetes (42 % vs. 29 %, P < 0.05) and in diabetic patients, the incidence of insulin dependency was higher in female patients (50 % vs. 33 %, P < 0.05). Overall perioperative mortality was higher in female patients (2.7 % vs. 1.8 %, P < 0.05). This difference increased when diabetes was present (3.9 % vs. 1.8 %, P < 0.05) and was even higher in insulin-dependent patients (4.9 % vs. 1.9 %, P < 0.05). However, when adjusting for age and diabetes, the differences were reduced. This was most evident when subgroups of age-adjusted patients without any additional risk factors were analyzed: no gender-specific difference in perioperative mortality was observed.

Conclusions: Female gender itself did not present as an independent risk factor. The presence of diabetes mellitus increased the risk in female patients significantly more than in male patients. The higher prevalence of diabetes in female patients in combination with the older age at presentation might result in the higher overall mortality observed in female patients compared to men.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1249924DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk factors
16
female gender
8
risk
8
coronary bypass
8
risk factor
8
distribution risk
8
diabetes mellitus
8
additional risk
8
female patients
8
female
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is increasingly used for obesity and metabolic disease, with safety profiles showing it is among the safest major operations. The last 20 + years have noted significantly improved safety that has been accompanied by decreasing length of stay and select populations electing for outpatient surgery, leading to continued decreases in cost. Regardless, readmissions and complications still occur, requiring inpatient postoperative care (IP-POC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven to be a powerful tool in preventing HIV infection. There is limited information about the factors associated with willingness to use different PrEP modalities among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Africa. We assessed willingness to use long-acting injectable PrEP (LAI-PrEP) among 14-24-year-old AGYW at high risk of HIV in Uganda, and associated factors determined using multivariable complementary log-log regression.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to explore the awareness, willingness, and engagement with pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among high-risk Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM) and to investigate the factors influencing its use. A cross-sectional survey of 1800 HIV-negative MSM was conducted in Chengdu, Suzhou, and Wuhan between June 2022 and February 2023 through in-person and online recruitment methods. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of PrEP use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pathogenesis of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection at the extremes of age: decipher the ominous tales of immune vulnerability.

Adv Biotechnol (Singap)

January 2025

National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.

The co-circulation of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 has led to co-infection events, primarily affecting children and older adults, who are at higher risk for severe disease. Although co-infection prevalence is relatively low, it is associated with worse outcomes compared to mono-infections. Previous studies have shown that the outcomes of co-infection depend on multiple factors, including viral interference, virus-host interaction and host response.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!