AI Article Synopsis

  • The hollow-fibre oxygenator is crucial for cardiopulmonary bypass during heart surgery, affecting pressure and flow quality due to energy losses.
  • A study involved 23 adult patients divided into two groups based on the type of oxygenator: one with high resistance/low compliance (Group 1) and another with low resistance/high compliance (Group 2).
  • Results showed a significant pressure decline in both groups during surgery, with similar mean radial artery pressures, indicating that while the lower resistance oxygenator had lower energy transfer, both types resulted in considerable loss of pump energy; thus, removing the oxygenator could enhance energy transfer.

Article Abstract

The hollow-fibre oxygenator is a key component of any extracorporeal circuit used to provide cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during open-heart surgery. Since the oxygenator is placed downstream of the pump, the energy losses over it have a direct impact on the quality of pulsatile pressure and flow waveforms. The objective of this study was to describe the effects of hydrodynamic characteristics of the oxygenator on energy transfer during pulsatile, normothermic CPB. Twenty-three adult patients scheduled for coronary bypass surgery were divided randomly into two groups, using either an oxygenator (Group 1) with a relatively high-resistance and low-compliance (2079 ± 148 dyn.s.cm(-5) and 0.00348 ± 0.00071 ml.mmHg(-1), respectively) or an oxygenator (Group 2) with a relatively low-resistance and high-compliance (884 ± 464 dyn.s.cm(-5) and 0.01325 ± 0.00161 ml.mmHg(-1), respectively). During perfusion, pre- and post-oxygenator pressures, radial artery pressure, and blood flow were recorded simultaneously. A 32% decline of mean pressure was observed in Group 1 and a 16% decline in Group 2 (p<0.0001). Another decrease by approximately 73% in mean pressure in the rest of the perfusion system was noted in both groups. The mean radial artery pressure did not differ between the groups (74 ± 6 mmHg in Group 1 and 73 ± 6 mmHg in Group 2, p=0.608). Although lower total energy transfer indices were noticed through the low-resistance oxygenator (Group 2), both oxygenators showed a decrease of the generated pump oscillatory energy of approximately 50%. Despite the differences in resistance and compliance of the hollow-fibre oxygenators used, both oxygenators cause a comparable loss of generated oscillatory energy. Exclusion of the oxygenator downstream of the pulsatile pump would improve energy transfer during CPB.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267659110385606DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

energy transfer
8
cardiopulmonary bypass
8
oxygenator group
8
oxygenator
6
oxygenator mechanical
4
mechanical characteristics
4
characteristics energy
4
transfer clinical
4
clinical cardiopulmonary
4
bypass hollow-fibre
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!