Objective: To determine essential workers' ability and willingness to report to duty during a serious pandemic outbreak and to identify modifiable risk factors.
Methods: Workers (N = 1103) from six essential workgroups completed an anonymous, cross-sectional survey.
Results: Although a substantial proportion of participants reported that they would be able (80%), fewer would be willing (65%) to report to duty. Only 49% of participants would be both able and willing. Factors significantly associated with ability/willingness included individual-level (eg, intentions to adhere to respiratory protection and pandemic vaccination recommendations) and organizational-level factors (eg, preparedness planning for respiratory protection and worker vaccination programs).
Conclusions: During a serious pandemic event, non-illness-related shortfalls among essential workers could be substantial. Organizational preparedness efforts should focus on worker protection programs and the development of policies that would facilitate the attendance of healthy workers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f43872 | DOI Listing |
Br J Nurs
January 2025
Associate Professor, Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham.
, Associate Professor, Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, discusses some recently published reports considering the national patient safety picture and issues around the duty of candour.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Head Trauma Rehabil
January 2025
Mental Health Service Line, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Tsen); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation & Extended Care, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Dr Finn); Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Dr Finn); Department of Research Methodology and Biostatistics, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida (Mrs Klocksieben); Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (O'Neil-Pirozzi); Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr O'Neil-Pirozzi); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas (Dr Sander); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, Texas (Dr Sander); Department of Research, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colorado (Drs Agtarap and Finn); Departments of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (Dr Dreer); Research Service, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, Florida (Dr Cotner); Research Service, Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence at James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, Florida (Drs Cotner and Nakase-Richardson); Research Department, Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, Virginia (Mss Vargas, and Dini, and Dr Perrin); Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (Ms Vargas); Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia (Ms Dini and Dr Perrin); Mental Health, School of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia (Dr Perrin); Mental Health and Behavioral Services, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, Florida (Drs Finn and Nakase-Richardson); and Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine Division, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida (Dr Nakase-Richardson).
Objective: To describe the self-reported needs of family caregivers of service members and veterans (SMVs) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) at 10 to 15 years post-injury and to identify unique predictors of unmet family needs.
Setting: Five Department of Veterans Affairs Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers.
Participants: A total of 209 family caregivers of SMVs with TBI from the VA TBI Model Systems national database who completed a 10- or 15-year follow-up assessment.
Mil Med
January 2025
Navy Medicine Readiness and Training Command, 620 John Paul Jones Cir, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA.
Background: The U.S. military utilizes small, forward deployed surgical teams to provide Role 2 surgical care in austere environments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMil Med
January 2025
Department of Pathology and Area Laboratory Services, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA.
Introduction: Gallbladder specimens from cholecystectomy procedures are a common specimen evaluated by military pathologists. These are often removed for inflammatory causes. Previous studies show that the incidence of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is around 3%.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychol Trauma
January 2025
ARQ Centrum'45, ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre.
Objective: In their work, police officers are routinely exposed to potentially traumatic events, some of which may also be morally distressing. Moral injury refers to the multidimensional impact of exposure to such potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs). Mainly originating from a military context, there is little empirical research on moral injury in policing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!