AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to investigate the characteristics of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) as a pacing site, comparing it to the traditional right ventricular apex to assess any advantages.
  • A total of 143 patients were studied to evaluate the RVOT using fluoroscopy and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), classifying the RVOT into three areas: anterior, septal, and free wall.
  • The results showed variability in QRS axis and morphology depending on the pacing site, indicating that while there is heterogeneity in RVOT pacing, defining precise cut-off points for ECG patterns relative to specific pacing sites remains challenging.

Article Abstract

Aims: The right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is used as an alternative pacing site, but its superiority to the RV apex remains to be established. This lack of proof may in part be explained by heterogeneity within the RVOT-paced group, due to poor definitions of the RVOT. The aim of the present study is to characterize the RVOT in terms of fluoroscopic and electrocardiographic parameters.

Methods And Results: One hundred and forty-three patients who underwent pacemaker implantation with a ventricular lead in the RVOT were included. Lead position was determined by fluoroscopy. The RVOT was divided into three areas: anterior, septal, and free wall (FW). On a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) during forced ventricular pacing, QRS duration, configuration, and amplitude was determined. Lead position was judged to be anterior in 52 (36%), septal in 43 (30%), and FW in 48 (34%) patients, respectively. QRS duration is not significantly different between groups. QRS axis differs significantly between pacing sites (septal 79 ± 31°, anterior 60 ± 46°, FW 47 ± 38°, P < 0.05). QRS vector in lead I and QRS morphology and vector in lead aVL differ significantly between pacing sites. Precordial transition is earlier (towards V1) in septal pacing.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates heterogeneity of pacing site and depolarization pattern within a cohort of patients paced form the RVOT. However, due to considerable overlap, we could not define clear cut-off point or devise flow-charts to match ECG and pacing site.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq341DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pacing site
12
ventricular outflow
8
outflow tract
8
lead position
8
qrs duration
8
pacing sites
8
vector lead
8
pacing
7
rvot
6
lead
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!