The bone-anchored-hearing-aid (BAHA) transduces airborne sound into skull vibration. Current bilateral BAHA configurations, for sounds directly facing listeners, will apply forces that are in-phase with each other and directed roughly towards the center of the head. Below approximately 1000 Hz the two cochleae respond in approximately the same direction and with approximately the same phase to each BAHA, thus it may be preferable to drive bilateral BAHAs such that when one pushes, the other pulls. This can be achieved by adjusting the relative phase offset of the BAHAs, and doing so results in greater vibration and improved hearing threshold. In this paper we compare performance of bilateral BAHAs driven in this configuration to the standard configuration. In twelve normal participants we show significant improvements in low-frequency (≤750 Hz) hearing thresholds using out-of-phase BAHAs. The threshold measurements are further supported by velocimetric measurements taken at the cochlear promontory in a cadaveric head. Comparing vibration arising from each configuration confirms that out-of-phase driving results in greater vibration. Neither dataset shows either improved or reduced threshold at high frequencies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2010.515621 | DOI Listing |
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
October 2024
Department of ENT-HNS, Command Hospital (Air Force), Bangalore, India.
Acta Otolaryngol
November 2023
Senior Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
No selection criteria for the four bone conduction hearing devices yet. To compare effectiveness of four bone conduction hearing devices in patients with bilateral Congenital Malformation of the Middle and Outer Ear (CMMOE). 24 Patients (25 ears) were divided into five groups: 1) Bone Anchored Hearing Aid softband (BAHA-s), 2) BAHA implant (BAHA-i nested within group 1), 3) Vibration Sound Bridge implant (VSB-i), 4) Bone Bridge implant (BB-i), and 5) Bone Conduction Hearing Aid softband (BCHA-s).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLaryngoscope
January 2024
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Objective: There is increased confusion regarding MRI-compatible CIs and BAHAs. This report describes two cases when patients underwent MRIs with non-MRI compatible devices.
Results: One patient with bilateral Cochlear Osias experienced dislocation of both internal magnets after 1.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
March 2020
Madras ENT Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Bilateral Bone Anchored Hearing Aids (BAHA) provide more subjective patient satisfaction and outcome than unilateral BAHA. Initially, percutaneous BAHAs were used for many decades. Transcutaneous BAHAs were started later to overcome problems associated with percutaneous ones.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg
September 2012
University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, Canada.
Objective: To systematically review the outcomes of bilateral versus unilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) for individuals with bilateral permanent conductive hearing loss (CHL) with the goal of (1) deriving clinically oriented insights into the advantages and disadvantages of bilateral fitting and (2) identifying gaps in knowledge to stimulate future research.
Data Sources: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies of all languages published between 1977 and July 2011.
Review Methods: Studies were included if subjects of any age had permanent bilateral CHL and bilateral implanted BAHAs.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!