AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a bedside swallowing evaluation (BSE) in identifying swallowing dysfunction in adult trauma patients after mechanical ventilation.
  • A total of 291 patients were assessed, and results showed that those who failed the BSE generally had longer mechanical ventilation periods and higher rates of aspiration risk.
  • The BSE proved to be a reliable tool, as all patients who passed it left the hospital without aspiration events, while certain factors like age and complexity of injuries correlated with higher failure rates.

Article Abstract

Background: Swallowing dysfunction can occur after mechanical ventilation, leading to complications such as aspiration and pneumonia. After mechanical ventilation, authors have recommended evaluating patients with contrast studies or endoscopy to identify patients at risk for swallowing dysfunction and aspiration. The purpose of the study was to determine if a bedside swallowing evaluation (BSE) can identify patients with swallowing dysfunction after mechanical ventilation.

Methods: This is a 1-year (2008) prospective study of all adult trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit requiring mechanical ventilation. Upon separation from mechanical, all patients received a BSE. The BSE used mental status, facial symmetry, swallow reflex, and oral ice chips and water to identify swallowing dysfunction. Patients who passed the BSE were advanced to oral intake per physician orders, whereas patients who failed the BSE were allowed nothing by mouth.

Results: A total of 345 patients were included; 54 died before separation from mechanical ventilation and were excluded. The remaining 291 patients underwent BSE after separation from mechanical ventilation, with 143 (49%) passing and 148 (51%) failing. Patients who failed the BSE required mechanical ventilation longer than those who passed (14 ± 13 vs 5 ± 20 days, P = .001). In addition, only 23% of patients extubated within 72 hours failed the BSE, whereas 78% of those intubated more than 72 hours failed the BSE (P < .001). All patients who passed the BSE were discharged from the hospital without a clinical aspiration event. Independent risk factors for failure of BSE included tracheostomy, older age, prolonged mechanical ventilation, delirium tremens, traumatic brain injury, and spine fracture. Three (2%) patients who failed the BSE had a clinical aspiration event despite taking nothing by mouth.

Conclusions: A simple BSE can be used to identify patients at risk for swallowing dysfunction after mechanical ventilation. More importantly, BSE can safely clear patients without swallowing dysfunction, avoiding costly and time-consuming contrast studies or endoscopic evaluation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.05.036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mechanical ventilation
36
swallowing dysfunction
28
failed bse
20
patients
16
bse
14
dysfunction mechanical
12
identify patients
12
separation mechanical
12
patients failed
12
mechanical
11

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!