1. To assess the contributions of muscle chemoreflexes and central signals of motor command to cardiovascular to static exercise, blood pressure and heart rate were measured during three separate conditions: (i) isometric handgrip contractions, (ii) entrapment of metabolites produced by these contractions within the contracting muscles (chemoreflex effect), and (iii) attempted contractions of acutely paralysed muscles at three levels of effort (command effect). 2. The chemoreflex was assessed during circulatory occlusion applied as the contraction ceased. Paralysis was produced by local infusion of lignocaine distal to a sphygmomanometer cuff inflated above systolic pressure. 3. Blood pressure and heart rate increased progressively during isometric contraction of 33 and 50% maximal voluntary strength (for 120 and 75 s respectively). Muscle chemoreflexes during occlusion also increased blood pressure in proportion to the duration of contraction but did not increase heart rate. During attempted contraction of paralysed muscles at three measured levels of motor command, blood pressure and heart rate increased, but only heart rate was graded with the level of command. 4. The pattern of cardiovascular response for the muscle chemoreflex (as indicated by the ratio of the changes in heart rate and blood pressure) differed from that for isometric contractions and for motor commands in isolation. The pattern for contractions and for moderate but not high intensities of motor command was similar. 5. These data suggest that cardiovascular responses to moderate intensities of static contraction can be produced primarily by motor command, but that both motor command and muscle chemoreflexes contribute to cardiovascular responses at higher intensities of static exercise. When studied in isolation, central motor command and muscle chemoreflexes do not produce the same pattern of circulatory responses.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1181730 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018284 | DOI Listing |
J Neurosci
January 2025
Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Humans adjust their movement to changing environments effortlessly via multisensory integration of the effector's state, motor commands, and sensory feedback. It is postulated that frontoparietal (FP) networks are involved in the control of prehension, with dorsomedial (DM) and dorsolateral (DL) regions processing the reach and the grasp, respectively. This study tested (5F, 5M participants) the differential involvement of FP nodes (ventral premotor cortex - PMv, dorsal premotor cortex - PMd, anterior intraparietal sulcus - aIPS, and anterior superior parietal-occipital cortex - aSPOC) in online adjustments of reach-to-grasp coordination to mechanical perturbations that disrupted arm transport.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPflugers Arch
January 2025
Division of Neurophysiology, Department of Physiology, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, 663 8501, Japan.
The nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) contains neurons that relay sensory swallowing commands information from the oropharyngeal cavity and swallowing premotor neurons of the dorsal swallowing group (DSG). However, the spatio-temporal dynamics of the interplay between the sensory relay and the DSG is not well understood. Here, we employed fluorescence imaging after microinjection of the calcium indicator into the NTS in an arterially perfused brainstem preparation of rat (n = 8) to investigate neuronal population activity in the NTS in response to superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) stimulation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurosci Res
January 2025
Neural Prosthetics Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan.
The primary motor cortex (M1) is believed to be a cortical center for the execution of limb movements. Although M1 neurons mainly project to the spinal cord on the contralateral side, some M1 neurons project to the ipsilateral side via the uncrossed corticospinal pathway. Moreover, some M1 neurons are activated during ipsilateral forelimb movements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Neuroanat
January 2025
Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Hodological patterning refers to developmental mechanisms that link the location of neurons in the brain or spinal cord to specific axonal trajectories that direct connectivity to synaptic targets either within the central nervous system or in the periphery. In vertebrate motor circuits, hodological patterning has been demonstrated at different levels, from the final motor output of somatic and preganglionic autonomic neurons targeting peripheral motoneurons and ganglion cells, to premotor inputs from spinal and brainstem neuron populations targeting the somatic motoneurons and preganglionic autonomic neurons, to cortical neurons that delegate movement commands to the brainstem and spinal neurons. In many cases molecular profiling reveals potential underlying mechanisms whereby selective gene expression creates the link between location and axon trajectory.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Robot
January 2025
Research Center for Information and Communication Technologies, Department of Computer Engineering, Automation and Robotics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Robots have to adjust their motor behavior to changing environments and variable task requirements to successfully operate in the real world and physically interact with humans. Thus, robotics strives to enable a broad spectrum of adjustable motor behavior, aiming to mimic the human ability to function in unstructured scenarios. In humans, motor behavior arises from the integrative action of the central nervous system and body biomechanics; motion must be understood from a neuromechanics perspective.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!