In terrestrial organisms, sensitivity to the Earth's magnetic field is mediated by at least two different magnetoreception mechanisms, one involving biogenic ferromagnetic crystals (magnetite/maghemite) and the second involving a photo-induced biochemical reaction that forms long-lasting, spin-coordinated, radical pair intermediates. In some vertebrate groups (amphibians and birds), both mechanisms are present; a light-dependent mechanism provides a directional sense or 'compass', and a non-light-dependent mechanism underlies a geographical-position sense or 'map'. Evidence that both magnetite- and radical pair-based mechanisms are present in the same organisms raises a number of interesting questions. Why has natural selection produced magnetic sensors utilizing two distinct biophysical mechanisms? And, in particular, why has natural selection produced a compass mechanism based on a light-dependent radical pair mechanism (RPM) when a magnetite-based receptor is well suited to perform this function? Answers to these questions depend, to a large degree, on how the properties of the RPM, viewed from a neuroethological rather than a biophysical perspective, differ from those of a magnetite-based magnetic compass. The RPM is expected to produce a light-dependent, 3-D pattern of response that is axially symmetrical and, in some groups of animals, may be perceived as a pattern of light intensity and/or color superimposed on the visual surroundings. We suggest that the light-dependent magnetic compass may serve not only as a source of directional information but also provide a spherical coordinate system that helps to interface metrics of distance, direction and spatial position.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.020792 | DOI Listing |
BJUI Compass
December 2024
USC Institute of Urology, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA.
Objective: To assess the carbon footprint, accessibility, and diagnostic performance of an expedited 'One-Stop' prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic pathway.
Materials And Methods: A total of 1083 consecutive patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy (PBx) were identified from a prospective database. The patients were divided according to the diagnostic pathway: One-Stop, with MRI and same-day PBx (3 hours apart), or Standard, with MRI followed by a second visit for PBx.
Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of perineal access cannulas tethered to a biplanar ultrasound probe in cognitive transperineal prostate biopsies of targets identified by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) by comparing the results of the PrecisionPoint (PP) Transperineal Access System with the double-freehand (DFH) technique.
Patients And Methods: All patients who underwent cognitive transperineal prostate biopsy of mpMRI targets using the PP or DFH technique between November 2020 and September 2023 were enrolled. All data related to mpMRI target biopsies were stratified by technique, visibility in transrectal ultrasound and analysed by comparing PP versus DFH.
BJUI Compass
December 2024
Department of Urology, Jules Bordet Institute, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the precision and safety of targeted microwave ablation (TMA) using organ-based tracking (OBT) fusion, in patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer.
Patients And Method: We conducted a prospective, multicentric trial. Eligible patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 20 ng/mL, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible index tumour of Gleason score 3 + 4, with largest axis ≤15 mm and distant of at least 5 mm from the rectum and apex.
Am J Psychiatry
January 2025
Institute for Advanced Diagnostics and Treatment, Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore (Aaronson, Miller, LaPratt, Swartz, Shoultz, Lauterbach); Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland, Baltimore (Aaronson, van der Vaart, Lauterbach); VA Palo Alto Health Care System and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA (Suppes); Departments of Psychiatry and Radiology, Columbia University, New York (Sackeim).
Nat Commun
December 2024
Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QD, UK.
The radical pair mechanism accounts for the magnetic field sensitivity of a large class of chemical reactions and is hypothesised to underpin numerous magnetosensitive traits in biology, including the avian compass. Traditionally, magnetic field sensitivity in this mechanism is attributed to radical pairs with weakly interacting, well-separated electrons; closely bound pairs were considered unresponsive to weak fields due to arrested spin dynamics. In this study, we challenge this view by examining the FAD-superoxide radical pair within cryptochrome, a protein hypothesised to function as a biological magnetosensor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!