Background: Glycosylated hemoglobin evaluation is very important for assessing the control of diabetes. Since the use of point-of-care (POC) devices for monitoring HbA1c is increasing, it is important to determine how these devices compare in relation to instrumentation used in the central laboratory (CL).
Methods: Eighty-eight randomly selected samples previously analyzed using the Bio-Rad Variant™ II Hemoglobin Testing System were run on three POC Analyzers (Siemens DCA Vantage™ Analyzer, Axis-Shield Afinion™ AS100 Analyzer, and Bio-Rad In2it™ Analyzer).
Results: All POC instruments showed good correlation to the CL method (R(2)>0.95 for all methods). HbA1c levels obtained using Variant II (mean=7.9; 95% CI=7.5-8.3%) and In2it (mean=7.9; 95% C.I.=7.5-8.2%) instruments were found to have no statistical mean difference (p=0.21), while the values obtained using DCA Vantage (mean=7.2% C.I.=6.9-7.5%) and Afinion (mean=7.3% C.I.=7.0-7.6%) instruments were different (p<0.001) from those of the CL method. The Afinion and DCA Vantage instruments increasingly underestimated the HbA1c compared to the CL as the HbA1c values increased. These differences were even more striking when the estimated average glucose is calculated.
Conclusions: Despite significant variation of results among the POC instruments evaluated relative to the CL method and pending resolution of HbA1c standardization issues, we conclude that all of the POC instruments can be used for HbA1c determination if clinicians are given instrument specific reference ranges.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2010.09.004 | DOI Listing |
Br J Anaesth
February 2025
Transfusion Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Clinical Haematology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Accurate and timely diagnostic information is a vital adjunct to clinical assessment to inform therapeutic decision-making, including decisions to transfuse, or not transfuse, blood components. A prospective cohort study of diagnostic point-of-care (POC) haemoglobin measurements on arterial or central venous samples from adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery compared three widely used devices, HemoCue®, i-STAT™, and the Rad-67™ pulse CO-Oxymeter® finger sensor device, against standard laboratory haemoglobin measurements, but importantly not against a blood gas analyser. The study focused on haemoglobin results below 100 g L to establish the utility of these devices to guide red cell transfusion decisions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiosensors (Basel)
January 2025
Institute of Biological Information Processing, Bioelectronics (IBI-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
With the goal of fast and accurate diagnosis of infectious diseases, this study presents a novel electrochemical biosensor that employs a refined aptamer (C9t) for the detection of spike (S) protein SARS-CoV-2 variants in a flexible multielectrode aptasensor array with PoC capabilities. Two aptamer modifications were employed: removing the primer binding sites and including two dithiol phosphoramidite anchor molecules. Thus, reducing fabrication time from 24 to 3 h and increasing the stability and sparseness for multi-thiol aptasensors compared to a standard aptasensor using single thiols, without a reduction in aptamer density.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Total Environ
February 2025
National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Identifying the origins of storm fluvial particulate organic carbon (POC) provides information about the hydrological connectivity within the river corridor and the roles of the land-stream interface in the carbon cycle. However, current understanding of storm-induced POC source dynamics is constrained by observations limited in space and time. This study presents a unique approach integrating higher spatial and temporal resolution sampling with a multi-biomarker analysis to better understand POC source dynamics across scales.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExpert Rev Mol Diagn
January 2025
Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Introduction: continues to be the most common bacterial infection worldwide and rates continue to increase despite long-standing control efforts. Point of care (POC) testing options may offer improvements in case finding that lead to improved control of this sexually transmitted infection (STI).
Areas Covered: This review will provide information on the three tests that have US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance and describe assays in the developmental pipeline.
J Clin Periodontol
January 2025
Perio-Implant Innovation Center, Institute for Integrated Oral, Craniofacial and Sensory Research and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology and National Clinical Research Center of Stomatology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) point-of-care oral rinse test (POC-ORT) for predicting periodontitis in treatment-naïve subjects in two independent studies and update a recent meta-analysis.
Methods: The aMMP-8 POC-ORT index test was performed in a representative population in Hong Kong, China, and a consecutive convenience sample in Shanghai, China. The reference standard was the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontal diseases.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!